Two more weeks!
Two more weeks!
Offshore Fingerprints of Fraud.. Lindell's Election Data Packet Captures Prove massive digital ballot stuffing for Joe Briben.. injected into voting machines of all 50 States.. time-stamped hard evidence proving these machines were manipulated over the internet by other countries.. primarily China.
(generaldispatch.whatfinger.com)
Now we'll find out if scotus can ignore this elephant in the room.
Now we'll find out if scotus can ignore this **elephant** in the room.
I don't see how this level of capture was possible. For anyone to have captured packets at EVERY voting location:
requires a vast amount of equipment
requires a vast amount of techs
requires a vast amount of preparation
requires a vast amount of travel
requires a vast amount of storage
requires a vast amount of access to ACTUAL voting machine networks.
If they hacked anything remotely, they would:
have knowledge of the temporary networks setup for the voting machines
have remote access to these temporary networks
or have access to either some large network hub like the att ones we all read about or access to undersea trunk splices that only the government has access to.
And then, on top of that, if you consider packet capture, just because you have captured packets DOES NOT mean anything at all. Most connections are encrypted, and you would end up with packets of the encrypted data that would look like gibberish on analysis.
Frankly, it would be extremely difficult for the techs that would have put and administered the networks the machines were connected to to prove that there has hacking simply by packet capture.
What this looks like is the FBI / CIA / WHOEVER is trying to get Mike to spend all of his money chasing shadows. Mike is a great and honourable man and he is fighting for what he is right. The problem is that Mike doesn't have any advisors (like Trump) to help him understand when the carrot he is following is on a string puppeteered by the three letter agencies that smell his honest desire and are just fucking with him to make him spend all his money before the mid terms and 2024.
I would love for all of this to be true, I would love to be wrong and for Mikes team to be right.
I don't see how this level of capture was possible. For anyone to have captured packets at EVERY voting location:
* requires a vast amount of equipment
* requires a vast amount of techs
* requires a vast amount of preparation
* requires a vast amount of travel
* requires a vast amount of storage
* requires a vast amount of access to ACTUAL voting machine networks.
If they hacked anything remotely, they would:
* have knowledge of the temporary networks setup for the voting machines
* have remote access to these temporary networks
* or have access to either some large network hub like the att ones we all read about or access to undersea trunk splices that only the government has access to.
And then, on top of that, if you consider packet capture, just because you have captured packets DOES NOT mean anything at all. Most connections are encrypted, and you would end up with packets of the encrypted data that would look like gibberish on analysis.
Frankly, it would be extremely difficult for the techs that would have put and administered the networks the machines were connected to to prove that there has hacking simply by packet capture.
What this looks like is the FBI / CIA / WHOEVER is trying to get Mike to spend all of his money chasing shadows. Mike is a great and honourable man and he is fighting for what he is right. The problem is that Mike doesn't have any advisors (like Trump) to help him understand when the carrot he is following is on a string puppeteered by the three letter agencies that smell his honest desire and are just fucking with him to make him spend all his money before the mid terms and 2024.
I would love for all of this to be true, I would love to be wrong and for Mikes team to be right.
Maybe there’s an explanation for it, but he needs to be forthcoming. He does a lot of hinting and dropping, he needs to produce his work. Immediately. Even people who believe him are starting to tune him out.
Maybe there’s an explanation for it, but he needs to be forthcoming. He does a lot of hinting and dropping, he needs to produce his work. Immediately. Even people who believe him are starting to tune him out.
LOL this joker has caused a long line waiting for the pot because he won't shit or get off.
LOL this joker has caused a long line waiting for the pot because he won't shit or get off.
ahahahahha great retort
ahahahahha great retort
Wouldn't that be the exact purview of the NSA and 4plus1 eye Nations.
Wouldn't that be the exact purview of the NSA and 4plus1 eye Nations.
Lol, you summarized my post into like 13 words.
Yes, that is precisely what I am getting at. Packet capture is not hard. There is a ton of paid and free gui software to do this, the actual packet capture is not hard. You just have an external 10TB drive and hit record on the software of mount some cloud storage and hit record.
What is hard:
Planning.
Organization.
Staffing.
Training for staff (where are you going to find techs with free time to place them selves near every voting location?)
Transport.
Timinig.
Access.
Storage. You gotta get to the voting place early, you gotta log on to the correct network, you gotta know which network the voting machines are on, you need wifi passwords if it is wireless. You need port access if it is wired (sometimes hard, although sometimes you just need to plug into an open port in a spare room). You gotta start your packet capture software and let it run FOR THE WHOLE DURATION OF THE EVENT.
Placement / Pickup - If you aren't going to be on site, you need to place your packet capture device, leave it, then pick it up without raising suspicion a few days later.
Remote - access to at & t central routing rooms ... yeah.
Remote - access to maybe a drop into a majour trunk somewhere .... yeah
Remote - if you somehow know where all the temporary networks are and you manage to vpn into them ... how do you know you are on the right temporary network? Anyone can put up a wifi router in a room and connect up all the voting machines to it for one night and even the network admins wouldn't know the temporary network exists without proper deep packet inspection solutions in place, and most places just don't have that kind of budget. So ... yeah.
I don't know what I might be missing, but, this is fucking hard even for the three letter agencies, never mind some volunteers that were aware of the problems early enough in the voting process and managed to start planning, how far in advance to get this done? If you had to get all of the packet capture done even in only a subset of voting machines, how many people do you need to train and place? How far in advance do you have to start planning? How do you plan this in private such that no electronics are involved to keep the three letter agencies from getting a signal on your operation?
There are people here that know way more than me about opsec.
This just doesn't seem plausible at all to have packet capture. I really think someone is yanking this poor guys chain and trying to get him to empty his pockets on a chasing that magic carrot.
Now, if I am wrong, if anyone can provide some insight into how this might be plausible, I WILL GLADLY ADMIN I AM WRONG because I really want this to be true.
// EDIT: As I am writing this out I am also thinking about the plausability angles ... can any possible scenario be thought up where they could capture packets. The only one that I can think of would be maybe like only 2 or 3 guys, assuming they are the good guys on our side, that had the skills and managed to be in the right IT teams on site or near site to capture traffic at a few places.
That is the only plausible scenario, and even then I am suspicious.
Lol, you summarized my post into like 13 words.
Yes, that is precisely what I am getting at. Packet capture is not hard. There is a ton of paid and free gui software to do this, the actual packet capture is not hard. You just have an external 10TB drive and hit record on the software of mount some cloud storage and hit record.
What is hard:
* Planning.
* Organization.
* Staffing.
* Training for staff (where are you going to find techs with free time to place them selves near every voting location?)
* Transport.
* Timinig.
* Access.
* Storage. You gotta get to the voting place early, you gotta log on to the correct network, you gotta know which network the voting machines are on, you need wifi passwords if it is wireless. You need port access if it is wired (sometimes hard, although sometimes you just need to plug into an open port in a spare room). You gotta start your packet capture software and let it run FOR THE WHOLE DURATION OF THE EVENT.
* Placement / Pickup - If you aren't going to be on site, you need to place your packet capture device, leave it, then pick it up without raising suspicion a few days later.
* Remote - access to at & t central routing rooms ... yeah.
* Remote - access to maybe a drop into a majour trunk somewhere .... yeah
* Remote - if you somehow know where all the temporary networks are and you manage to vpn into them ... how do you know you are on the right temporary network? Anyone can put up a wifi router in a room and connect up all the voting machines to it for one night and even the network admins wouldn't know the temporary network exists without proper deep packet inspection solutions in place, and most places just don't have that kind of budget. So ... yeah.
I don't know what I might be missing, but, this is fucking hard even for the three letter agencies, never mind some volunteers that were aware of the problems early enough in the voting process and managed to start planning, how far in advance to get this done? If you had to get all of the packet capture done even in only a subset of voting machines, how many people do you need to train and place? How far in advance do you have to start planning? How do you plan this in private such that no electronics are involved to keep the three letter agencies from getting a signal on your operation?
There are people here that know way more than me about opsec.
This just doesn't seem plausible at all to have packet capture. I really think someone is yanking this poor guys chain and trying to get him to empty his pockets on a chasing that magic carrot.
Now, if I am wrong, if anyone can provide some insight into how this might be plausible, I WILL GLADLY ADMIN I AM WRONG because I really want this to be true.
// EDIT: As I am writing this out I am also thinking about the plausability angles ... can any possible scenario be thought up where they could capture packets. The only one that I can think of would be maybe like only 2 or 3 guys, assuming they are the good guys on our side, that had the skills and managed to be in the right IT teams on site or near site to capture traffic at a few places.
That is the only plausible scenario, and even then I am suspicious.
All electronic communication data is captured by NSA and 4plus 1, but specifically all that's needed are the Ip addresses for those election polling centres, which is a fairly simple task if one really wanted to find out . Its a lot of human intensive hours to 'unmask, decrypt, decipher, collate and analyse the packets etc' but not impossible nor improbable if that indeed is what those with the authority to order it done, did so. I'm on the fence - simply bc there's has been no actual verifiable evidence for either happening ....
All electronic communication data is captured by NSA and 4plus 1, but specifically all that's needed are the Ip addresses for those election polling centres, which is a fairly simple task if one really wanted to find out .
Its a lot of human intensive hours to 'unmask, decrypt, decipher, collate and analyse the packets etc' but not impossible nor improbable if that indeed is what those with the authority to order it done, did so. I'm on the fence - simply bc there's has been no actual verifiable evidence for either happening ....
You would love to be wrong but you are gonna hate it as you are right.
You would love to be wrong but you are gonna hate it as you are right.
How in the hell could Mike Lindell capture data packets from voting machines all across the country ? He has some explaining to do.
How in the hell could Mike Lindell capture data packets from voting machines all across the country ?
He has some explaining to do.
Money moves mountains. Mike is a Revere class Patriot risking everything to save everything.. (so nothing to lose). Question is.. why are other billionaires sitting around watching their Country get pulled down into the 666th level of Hell.
Money moves mountains. Mike is a Revere class Patriot risking everything to save everything.. (so nothing to lose).
Question is.. why are other billionaires sitting around watching their Country get pulled down into the 666th level of Hell.
I don't doubt Mike's loyalty, but unless he's got the NSA in his pocket he is just blowing hot air.
I don't doubt Mike's loyalty, but unless he's got the NSA in his pocket he is just blowing hot air.
he just bet $5 million, played enough poker to KNOW Mike's holding a pat hand
he just bet $5 million, played enough poker to KNOW Mike's holding a pat hand
Boob bait for q-tards. He is probably on the CCP payroll. Good movies require good actors.
Boob bait for q-tards. He is probably on the CCP payroll. Good movies require good actors.
I’m definitely keeping an open mind here, he’s been working hard on this and I admire the guy. I really do. Having overcome substance abuse myself, I respect him. But he needs to show his work.
There were a couple of embarrassing errors in that video he put out that I haven’t forgotten. He really needs to show his work, release it to the public, let everyone see it for themselves.
I’m definitely keeping an open mind here, he’s been working hard on this and I admire the guy. I really do. Having overcome substance abuse myself, I respect him. But he needs to show his work.
There were a couple of embarrassing errors in that video he put out that I haven’t forgotten. He really needs to show his work, release it to the public, let everyone see it for themselves.
He really needs to show his work, release it to the public,
He's not going to thats how a SCAM works
He really needs to show his work, release it to the public,
He's not going to thats how a SCAM works
Joe Bribin lol
Joe Bribin lol
(post is archived)