President Trump: “Under the weak leadership of Mitch McConnell, Senate Republicans continue to lose. He lost Arizona, he lost Georgia, he ignored Election Fraud and he doesn’t fight.. RINOs are ruining America, right alongside Communist Democrats.”

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (23).

[–] • 0 pt

Balderdash. This reply sounds like it came out out of the mouths of RINO Jeff Flake or Paul Ryan. No one believes this. You are in league with the other '7 month-ers' team members, who all echo the same Alinsky spin cycle.

"The way you absolute dipshits keep living in your fantasy reality makes you tranny-tier intellects."

This is classic Alinsky racism and bigotry.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

You are such a fool. Bigotry? Fuck trannies You don't know jack shit about Alinksy aside from what you have gleaned from podcasts and other "deep thinkers". Probably like Bongino, I am guessing. You are a manlet LARPing.

Trump did nothing. People are not doing shit because they think Trump is going to do something. Again, just like with Q... the people sit on their asses waiting for a savior. I noticed that you didn't attempt to disprove anything that I said, you just dismissed it with claims of bigotry. THAT is an Alinsky tactic. Maybe look into it next time your bull and wife take a break?

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Your talk is re-laundered Alinsky tactics. We aren't falling for it.

This article by why Trump was unable to act. It would have been premature for one thing and hinges on Durham's investigation. Trump declassifying information would have caused massive backlash. Durham's investigation is on-going and the declass material is material evidence against those corrupt individuals.

To answer your response. I provide the following.

Question to ask yourself - what happens if Durham finds the DOJ accomplices in the crimes?

"Following consultation with Mr. Durham, I have determined that, in light of the extraordinary circumstances relating to these matters, the public interest warrants Mr. Durham continuing this investigation pursuant to the powers and independence afforded by the Special Counsel regulations. "Accordingly, by virtue of the authority vested in the Attorney General, including 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 510, and 515...." 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 510, 515 509 (Section to enforce human rights laws) (italics mine) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/part-II/chapter-31 This is indicative that Durham is a criminal investigation of human rights violations. 510 (delegation of authority) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/510 "The Attorney General may from time to time make such provisions as he considers appropriate authorizing the performance by any other officer, employee, or agency of the Department of Justice of any function of the Attorney General." From my reading of 510, you can think of Durham as Attorney General when it comes to prosecution of any crimes found during his investigation. 515 (authority for legal proceedings) "The Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice, or any attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law, may, when specifically directed by the Attorney General, conduct any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal..." https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/515 My reading of 515 is Durham will run the show. The Durham post is no joke. What is going on right now is all about preparing us for Durham to run the most important trial in world history. Btw it's either hilarious or disturbing to look at how little Durham has spent so far. Have a look if you want a laugh. https://www.justice.gov/file/1399136/download Maybe more specifically here in 28 U.S.C. §§ 526: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/526 "The Attorney General may investigate the official acts, records, and accounts of...the United States attorneys, marshals, trustees..." (italics mine) So Durham, with the Attorney General powers delegated to him by Barr, would prosecute the case against DoJ itself. We joke about Durham but it's a big friggin deal that he is specifically working on human rights crimes and would act as AG in prosecuting them.

EDIT: I think the big open question, that would likely land in the Supreme Court, is what happens if Durham finds the current AG is potentially a criminal, or vice versa? Which would take precedence? Does a provision exist for this?

This Sub may not be for you. You're a Newbie having been here for only 7 months. But rules are rules. The rules are henceforth:

This is a Pro-Q, Pro-Trump sub for research and news regarding both.

RULES FOR SUBMITTING POSTS

*No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing. Free debate is allowed and encouraged as long as it is civil.

Quality Posts Only.

None of your posts seem to fit this criteria.

Your talk is re-laundered Alinsky tactics. We aren't falling for it. This article by [CTH explains](https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/06/28/an-open-letter-to-governor-ron-desantis-the-december-1st-collusion-between-ag-bill-barr-and-the-ap-provides-a-stark-warning/) why Trump was unable to act. It would have been premature for one thing and hinges on Durham's investigation. Trump declassifying information would have caused massive backlash. Durham's investigation is on-going and the declass material is material evidence against those corrupt individuals. To answer your response. I provide the following. Question to ask yourself - what happens if Durham finds the DOJ accomplices in the crimes? "Following consultation with Mr. Durham, I have determined that, in light of the extraordinary circumstances relating to these matters, the public interest warrants Mr. Durham continuing this investigation pursuant to the powers and independence afforded by the Special Counsel regulations. "Accordingly, by virtue of the authority vested in the Attorney General, including 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 510, and 515...." 28 U.S.C. §§ 509, 510, 515 509 (Section to enforce human rights laws) (italics mine) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/part-II/chapter-31 This is indicative that Durham is a criminal investigation of human rights violations. 510 (delegation of authority) https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/510 "The Attorney General may from time to time make such provisions as he considers appropriate authorizing the performance by any other officer, employee, or agency of the Department of Justice of any function of the Attorney General." From my reading of 510, you can think of Durham as Attorney General when it comes to prosecution of any crimes found during his investigation. 515 (authority for legal proceedings) "The Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice, or any attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law, may, when specifically directed by the Attorney General, conduct any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal..." https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/515 My reading of 515 is Durham will run the show. The Durham post is no joke. What is going on right now is all about preparing us for Durham to run the most important trial in world history. Btw it's either hilarious or disturbing to look at how little Durham has spent so far. Have a look if you want a laugh. https://www.justice.gov/file/1399136/download Maybe more specifically here in 28 U.S.C. §§ 526: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/526 "The Attorney General may investigate the official acts, records, and accounts of...the United States attorneys, marshals, trustees..." (italics mine) So Durham, with the Attorney General powers delegated to him by Barr, would prosecute the case against DoJ itself. We joke about Durham but it's a big friggin deal that he is specifically working on human rights crimes and would act as AG in prosecuting them. EDIT: I think the big open question, that would likely land in the Supreme Court, is what happens if Durham finds the current AG is potentially a criminal, or vice versa? Which would take precedence? Does a provision exist for this? This Sub may not be for you. You're a Newbie having been here for only 7 months. But rules are rules. The rules are henceforth: This is a Pro-Q, Pro-Trump sub for research and news regarding both. RULES FOR SUBMITTING POSTS *No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing. Free debate is allowed and encouraged as long as it is civil. * Quality Posts Only. None of your posts seem to fit this criteria.

parent
link