WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

467

Reminder, it shows promise only.

Reminder, it shows promise only.

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

Is it patentable?

Three companies are already developing an antiviral, one is Japanese and the other two are Pfizer and Merck. They’ll probably be a $1000 dollar a pill twice a day for two weeks and the pcr test cycles will be set to 95 up from 45. And the money will print itself.

https://archive.is/iyxtI

[–] 1 pt

Remdesivir is $2000 per treatment, the only problem is that it doesn't work at all and kills sometimes. Ivermectin works very well, so they now try to make a derivative that can get patented. But the solution Merk found is the best of all because they don't need to kill any patients to get rich: They get 1.2 billion taxpayer dollars as soon as the FDA approves their drug - regardless if it works or not. https://www.theepochtimes.com/us-spending-1-2-billion-on-mercks-covid-19-treatment-is-a-waste-of-taxpayers-money-doctor_3861829.html?utm_source=gab

[–] 0 pt

Merck’s a boondoggle after seeing that, at least the Japanese are trying.

What’s better Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin?

I have all kinds of Hydroxychloroquine I can’t find proper dosing etc besides the purposefully failed studies do you have a link to dosing etc.

My elderly uncle went to the doctor at the beginning of the pandemic for shoulder pain, the x-rays didn’t show arthritis but the doctor claimed he had it and gave him a prescription for hcq, even though he has heart problems. His heart doctor told him not to take it and referred him to a specialist and he had his shoulder joint replaced and is all better.

But I told him to keep getting the prescriptions filled, so I have a 15 month supply currently.

[–] 0 pt

Both.

Check out America’s Frontline Doctors website. They have treatment protocols and use both HCQ and Ivermectin.

They have dosages on their site.

[–] 0 pt

What’s better Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin?

HCQ would have saved tens of thousands of lives if used until better medication was found. The drawback is that it needs a high dosage to work against viruses. Ivermectin is almost a silver bullet, it just cannot get used if the blood-brain barrier is compromized (by illness, medication, pregnancy, lactating).

Then there are a dozen or so other drugs that help keeping the virus in check (famotidine, bromhexine, monoclonal antibodies, ..), drugs that protect the body from the symptoms caused by the virus like oxidative stress and blood clotting (n-acetyl-cystein NAC, melatonin, vitamin C IV, heparin), and drugs that prevent the body from killing itself by an overreacting immune system (vitamin D, steroids).

[–] 0 pt

Patriot , there is nothing they have I would ever trust.

[–] 1 pt

I wasn’t talking about the new drugs, the one from the article that’s being “repurposed” and is over 100 years old.

Suramin is a drug that has been used to treat African sleeping sickness and river blindness for over a hundred years. Suramin has also been shown to be an inhibitor against a wide variety of viruses, including Zika and Chikungunya viruses, indicating its diverse mechanisms of action against multiple viruses.

If big pharma can’t get a patent on it, it will never be used.

[–] 0 pt

Patriot, I agree about Big Pharma. What God created I trust, and many things have been used for thousands of years. What is created in a experimental lab I make distance from, they can tell me in 30 years how well it worked . There is no money to be made with cures . I refuse to be a Lab Rat.

I heard you can get these through America's Frontline Doctors but haven't checked into it

[–] 0 pt

Yeah these a new ones they’re trying to develop for “covid” like tamiflu for the flu. You can get HCQ and ivermectin through America’s frontline doctors though.