WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

921

Having problems buying the DOJ claim on the ethics training. When we look at Fraud committed on the FISA Courts and zero arrests for this Felony.

Having problems buying the DOJ claim on the ethics training. When we look at Fraud committed on the FISA Courts and zero arrests for this Felony.

(post is archived)

Good question. Here's the letter from Johnson and Grassley:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21015828-grassley-johnson-letter-to-doj

Excerpt:

Ms. Hennessey’s apparent bias against Durham’s inquiry presents a clear conflict that makes it impossible for her to be objective and credible with respect to any elements relating to the Durham inquiry, should she have access to any of it.

They are correct, and she was probably sent there for that purpose. She is one of Omidyar's people.

[–] 0 pt

What powers does she have over Durham? And is this lawful?

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

It's lawful but certainly not ethical - a severe conflict of interest. I don't think she'd have supervisory power over him, but she certainly would have a level of access (which they probably already have.)