Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

698

Ever hear of the missing 13th Amendment? Me either. This is fascinating. Putting this amendment back into existence would go a long way in taking back America.

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine. By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a thirteenth amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution.

After studying the original thirteenth amendment’s language and historical context, they realized that the principle intent of the missing 13th amendment was to prohibit lawyers, particularly members of the BAR association, from serving in government!

This missing 13th Amendment suppressed and even stopped the forming or continued existence of any BAR association for over four decades, from 1822 to 1867, and evidence of its existence has been found in over 10 different states and territories throughout the United States.

How did a lawfully ratified Amendment to the Constitution of the United States simply disappear, vanish, without so much as a nod of disturbance, or at least some curiosity from the American people? And an amendment that deliberately targeted attorneys who were members of the BAR association, to prevent BAR members from holding any public office - thereby preventing attorneys from passing legislation that would most assuredly serve the greedy and nefarious interests of not only the BAR association itself, but also the King of England, right along with the other royal heads of Europe? So that WE might not be conquered from within, as opposed to without?

The "missing" 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

More at link.

Ever hear of the missing 13th Amendment? Me either. This is fascinating. Putting this amendment back into existence would go a long way in taking back America. In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine. By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a thirteenth amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. After studying the *original* thirteenth amendment’s language and historical context, they realized that the principle intent of the missing 13th amendment was to prohibit lawyers, particularly members of the BAR association, from serving in government! This missing 13th Amendment suppressed and even stopped the forming or continued existence of any BAR association for over four decades, from 1822 to 1867, and evidence of its existence has been found in over 10 different states and territories throughout the United States. How did a lawfully ratified Amendment to the Constitution of the United States simply disappear, vanish, without so much as a nod of disturbance, or at least some curiosity from the American people? And an amendment that deliberately targeted attorneys who were members of the BAR association, to prevent BAR members from holding any public office - thereby preventing attorneys from passing legislation that would most assuredly serve the greedy and nefarious interests of not only the BAR association itself, but also the King of England, right along with the other royal heads of Europe? So that WE might not be conquered from within, as opposed to without? The "missing" 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." More at link.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (19).
[–] • 0 pt

Thank you for the education Tewdrig. I see you have a big spot in your heart for this subject. Rightfully so. It's the opposite of what the bible teaches. You don't need many words to tell the truth.

[–] • 0 pt

"Rightfully so. It's the opposite of what the bible teaches. You don't need many words to tell the truth."

It is ironic you stated this. Immediately, the Book of Susanna comes to mind. I'll provide the story a little later, but first the text is not found in Protestant Bibles and is considered by Protestants as apochryphal. It is however listed in Article VI of the 39 Articles of the Church of England and was part of the original Septuagint (Old Testament) from the 2nd century BC. Every bit of reasoning tells me it should be in the Bible, but it is not. Here's the story and perhaps it sheds a light on why it was not included. Hmmmm...

A fair Hebrew wife named Susanna was falsely accused by lecherous voyeurs. As she bathes in her garden, having sent her attendants away, two elders, having previously said goodbye to each other, bump into each other again when they spy on her bathing. The two men realize they both lust for Susanna. When she makes her way back to her house, they accost her, demanding she have sex with them. When she refuses, they have her arrested, claiming that the reason she sent her maids away was to be alone as she was having sex with a young man under a tree.

She refuses to be blackmailed and is arrested and about to be put to death for adultery when the young Daniel interrupts the proceedings, shouting that the elders should be questioned to prevent the death of an innocent. After being separated, the two men are cross-examined about details of what they saw but disagree about the tree under which Susanna supposedly met her lover. In the Greek text, the names of the trees cited by the elders form puns with the sentence given by Daniel. The first says they were under a mastic tree (ὑπο σχίνον, hypo schinon), and Daniel says that an angel stands ready to cut (σχίσει, schisei) him in two. The second says they were under an evergreen oak tree (ὑπο πρίνον, hypo prinon), and Daniel says that an angel stands ready to saw (πρίσαι, prisai) him in two. The great difference in size between a mastic and an oak makes the elders' lie plain to all the observers. The false accusers are put to death, and virtue triumphs.

[–] • 0 pt

Great story. She was wise to face her accusers rather than commit sin and destroy much more. Trust and obey in God.