WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

675

Ever hear of the missing 13th Amendment? Me either. This is fascinating. Putting this amendment back into existence would go a long way in taking back America.

In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine. By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a thirteenth amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution.

After studying the original thirteenth amendment’s language and historical context, they realized that the principle intent of the missing 13th amendment was to prohibit lawyers, particularly members of the BAR association, from serving in government!

This missing 13th Amendment suppressed and even stopped the forming or continued existence of any BAR association for over four decades, from 1822 to 1867, and evidence of its existence has been found in over 10 different states and territories throughout the United States.

How did a lawfully ratified Amendment to the Constitution of the United States simply disappear, vanish, without so much as a nod of disturbance, or at least some curiosity from the American people? And an amendment that deliberately targeted attorneys who were members of the BAR association, to prevent BAR members from holding any public office - thereby preventing attorneys from passing legislation that would most assuredly serve the greedy and nefarious interests of not only the BAR association itself, but also the King of England, right along with the other royal heads of Europe? So that WE might not be conquered from within, as opposed to without?

The "missing" 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."

More at link.

Ever hear of the missing 13th Amendment? Me either. This is fascinating. Putting this amendment back into existence would go a long way in taking back America. In the winter of 1983, archival research expert David Dodge, and former Baltimore police investigator Tom Dunn were searching for evidence of government corruption in public records stored in the Belfast Library on the coast of Maine. By chance, they discovered the library’s oldest authentic copy of the Constitution of the United States (printed in 1825). Both men were stunned to see this document included a thirteenth amendment that no longer appears on current copies of the Constitution. After studying the *original* thirteenth amendment’s language and historical context, they realized that the principle intent of the missing 13th amendment was to prohibit lawyers, particularly members of the BAR association, from serving in government! This missing 13th Amendment suppressed and even stopped the forming or continued existence of any BAR association for over four decades, from 1822 to 1867, and evidence of its existence has been found in over 10 different states and territories throughout the United States. How did a lawfully ratified Amendment to the Constitution of the United States simply disappear, vanish, without so much as a nod of disturbance, or at least some curiosity from the American people? And an amendment that deliberately targeted attorneys who were members of the BAR association, to prevent BAR members from holding any public office - thereby preventing attorneys from passing legislation that would most assuredly serve the greedy and nefarious interests of not only the BAR association itself, but also the King of England, right along with the other royal heads of Europe? So that WE might not be conquered from within, as opposed to without? The "missing" 13th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows: "If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them." More at link.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Thank you for posting this. It needs to be repeated often. In the 1980s I listened to these guys tell us this with an amazing gaze. I thought then, we have always been in a state of war.

[–] 0 pt

In the 1980s I listened to these guys tell us this with an amazing gaze. I thought then, we have always been in a state of war.

I read this with the same amazing gaze. Knowing the true history of the US as compared to that we are brainwashed to believe really makes this piece of knowledge valuable. Evil forces have been attacking our country and it's foundation since it's inception. How many people today under the age of 30 know the White House was burnt down by the British 36 years after we supposedly beat them in the war for independence?

[–] 1 pt

"How many people today under the age of 30 know the White House was burnt down by the British 36 years after we supposedly beat them in the war for independence?"

To me even thinking about this is a depressing reality. Nevertheless, you are absolutely correct. We know the ending of the American Revolution was a negotiated settlement, which I tend to think was the modern version of a 'cease fire' and allowed the British to replenish their treasury. I wonder how much of an issue the original 13th Amendment had with the War of 1812? Was the settlement that Benjamin Franklin negotiated realized not being favorable to what the British crown thought it was? Was there duplicity? Was part of the settlement that a Central bank be established? Why did Franklin say - "A republic, if you can keep it" after being approached by a group of citizens asking what sort of government the delegates had created? The letters of Benjamin Franklin to the British MPs quote British papers of the 'Votes & parliamentary Speeches' that favored 'reconciliation' with the American colonists instead of surrender.

Whatever the dynamics were, I just can't get the thought out of my head that the original 13th Amendment was the lynch pin of this 1812 hostility. Why did the original 13th Amendment disappear soon after the War of 1812?

If one examines this, and considers how British lawyers were used as an influencing force in colonial America, along with its history, the original 13th Amendment undermined British control over America. A Central bank could not be effectively established without lawyers using 'barratry' and subverting the Republic. We see this with the struggle between founding fathers that wanted a Central bank and those opposing it. Plying the practice of lawyers opens barratry soon afterwards and it has a most subversive effect that no government can withstand. Lawyers who use barratry and the ancient art of rhetoric to obfuscate written laws seduce juries so they become polluted. Control over America was by making it dependent on fiat currency, which was the intent from the beginning. Instead of having costly British soldiers occupy the colonies, who colonists already proved their hatred, temerity and formidable fighting skills, why not rule from afar using lawyers who were more damaging to a government than any occupational force? There is far more to this than meets the eye, per se.

The American colonists called those who plied the practice of law 'Vermin'. This was one group of people they feared with reason--- a society you might say whose often insidious craft had claimed a multitude of victims, ever since the middle ages of Europe.

One group of people were hated and feared from Massachusetts Bay to Virginia. Our forefathers were baffled by them.

In 1641, Massachusetts Bay colony took a novel approach to the problem. The government attempted to starve those devils out of existence through economic exclusion. They were denied wages, and thereby it was hoped they would perish.

Four years later, Virginia followed the example of Massachusetts Bay, and for a while at least it seemed the dilemma had been relived. It had not. Somehow, the “Parasite” managed to survive, and the mere nearness of them made the colonists skin crawl.

In 1688 in Virginia the final solution: banishment. Exile. The “treacherous ones” were cast out of the colony. At last, after decades of enduring the psychological gloom, the sun came out, and the birds sang and all was right with the world. And the elation continued for a generation.

I’m not sure why the Virginians eventually allowed the outcasts to return, but they did. In 1680, after twenty-two years the despised ones were readmitted to the colony on the condition that they be subjected to the strictest surveillance. Like the Romans, the Virginians and the rest of the colonies failed to ride themselves of these 'Vermin' as well.

The American Bar is a subsidiary of the International Bar Association, which is headquartered in Britain. At least, the Romans tried to save their society. Today, we can see several striking examples of how the legal system has come undone.

At this point numbers 1-12 are AWOL as well.

Yes - I've heard about that but wasn't sure if it was actually verified. Interesting sleuthing there, Patriot2008

I'd like to see us switch to a form of law that can be understood by We The People and doesn't require a middle-man for interpretation. Much like the Pope being the middleman between people and God. UNNECESSARY.

[–] 2 pts

The war of 1812 never made sense to me. Now it does.

The Constitution requires three-quarters of the states to ratify a proposed amendment before it may be added to the Constitution. When Congress proposed the "Title of Nobility" Amendment in 1810, there were seventeen states, thirteen of which would have to ratify for the Amendment to be adopted. According to the National Archives, the following is a list of the twelve states that ratified, and their dates of ratification: Maryland, Dec. 25, 1810 Kentucky, Jan. 31, 1811 Ohio, Jan. 31, 1811 Delaware, Feb. 2, 1811 Pennsylvania, Feb. 6, 1811 New Jersey, Feb. 13, 1811 Vermont, Oct. 24, 1811 Tennessee, Nov. 21, 1811 Georgia, Dec. 13, 1811 North Carolina, Dec. 23, 1811 Massachusetts, Feb. 27, 1812 New Hampshire, Dec. 10, 1812 Before a thirteenth state could ratify, the War of 1812 broke out with England. By the time the war ended in 1814, the British had burned the Capitol, the Library of Congress, and most of the records of the first 38 years of government. Whether there was a connection between the proposed "title of nobility" amendment and the War of 1812 is not known. However, the momentum to ratify the proposed Amendment was lost in the tumult of war.

Interesting.

[–] 0 pt

I remember reading somewhere that the American legal system was originally designed so that any man with a 3rd grade education could represent himself in a court of law. If you are trying to control people for your own wealth you can't have a 3rd grade education understanding the law.

[–] 1 pt

Every politician that has taken the BAR exam has now a title from a foreign power. England. All should be removed from Congress. What a change in our political process! No lawyers!

[–] 3 pts

In addition to this. There is NO LICENSE to practice law in America. It's a bold face LIE. The bar membership is, in fact, a 'union card'. It is no different than an acto'rs or actress' gild card. Look this up. I have watched it in court being called out and the reaction from the judge was to allow the defendant to be represented by an 'Amicus' "this one time". The word 'Amicus' means -- (in Britain) a trade union representing workers in manufacturing industries, now part of Unite.

[–] 0 pt

I need to educate myself a lot more on this subject. It is calling me. All new to me this past year.