Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

501

A very good article was written by the Conservative Treehouse recently. In case anyone missed it, it is a must read. Understanding this will help shut down the few Doomsday bane; a miasmatic blight on this Sub.

Read the article and see how the Deep State (treason within) was able to shut down Trump declassifying information.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/06/28/an-open-letter-to-governor-ron-desantis-the-december-1st-collusion-between-ag-bill-barr-and-the-ap-provides-a-stark-warning/

A very good article was written by the Conservative Treehouse recently. In case anyone missed it, it is a must read. Understanding this will help shut down the few Doomsday bane; a miasmatic blight on this Sub. Read the article and see how the Deep State (treason within) was able to shut down Trump declassifying information. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/06/28/an-open-letter-to-governor-ron-desantis-the-december-1st-collusion-between-ag-bill-barr-and-the-ap-provides-a-stark-warning/

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (85).
[–] • 0 pt

Please answer the following:

@starjello has provided a new Sticky. Have you read it? Reply and state you understand the rules of this Sub.

[–] • 0 pt

I don't think your line of argumentation is productive. It would be better if you simply left him be. He loves this kind of conflict.

[–] • 0 pt

"It would be better if you simply left him be. He loves this kind of conflict."

Amazing commentary. It's not helpful to any debate when gainsaying is permitted. Your Sticky states --

"The rule distinguishes between good faith criticism and constructive criticism against bad faith criticism, destructive criticism and ad hominem, hence why "bashing" is what the rule is against and not merely anti-Q or anti-Trump posts generally."

Explain to me how gainsaying and the constant attempt to divide and forlornness equates to good faith and constant criticism? It does not. You know this. We have had this conversation before. There was a reason why I cc-ed you and it was my mistaken belief that you had actually provided rules to live by. There are good people here that are keeping this Sub afloat. If it is your intention to allow bots and PsyOpers to destroy the charter of this Sub, state it now. We prefer it to be a Pro-Q, Pro-Trump sub for research and news regarding both. That's why I and others are here. I'm very close to blocking this individual. The user still needs to answer the question though. We should all agree to these rules.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

It's not helpful to any debate when gainsaying is permitted.

How do you define "gainsay"? I've usually seen it used to mean "to contradict/deny" which is allowed because disagreement is allowed.

Explain to me how gainsaying and the constant attempt to divide and forlornness equates to good faith and constant criticism? It does not.

And I never said he was in good faith; I'm explicitly saying he feeds on having spats with people and feeding that troll won't do you any good. That's why in this particular case, it won't help because he already knows the rules and doesn't care. I'm working on a better solution than simply banning one account so he can feel justified and go off to make more.

I'm very close to blocking this individual.

I see in your other response you indicated you have. I'm sure that will make browsing and posting better for you.