Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Mike Lindell is putting his money where his mouth is. He now offered up a $5,000,000 Challenge for his Cyber Symposium on August 10th.

He announced it today on Steve Bannon’s show, Bannons War Room.

Steve Bannon: I don’t know what’s more over the top, our open or what Mike Lindell’s about to do… Mike, what are we talking about here? You’ve got this Cyber Symposium. It’s the 10th, 11th and 12th (August) in Sioux Falls South Dakota… You’ve invited all the world, all the top cyber experts. You’ve invited all the politicians. You’ve invited all the world’s media. You’re throwing down. You’re gonna present all of your data for the first time… And is the $5,000,000 kind of winner take all? Are you challenging people with a $5,000,000 offer if they can prove you wrong? If they can prove that you don’t know what you’re talking about, you’ve got nothing to show, they win $5,000,000? Walk us through this.

Mike Lindell: I decided, you know what? CNN Called. They’re trying to discredit the symposium before we even get it out there or before we even show it. So what I’m doing is I put up $5,000,000, noe remember the public is not invited. I want it to be the most watched event ever. And you’re gonna watch this challenge, it’s $5,000,000. If more than one get it then it’s split. It’s one $5,000,000 prize if they can show that this is not the valid data from the 2020 election, the November election.

Here’s a few reactions from the fine people of the internet…

“Mike’s putting his money where his mouth is! That’s the boldest “come at me bro” I’ve seen from anyone regarding the selection of 2020″

“Biden was installed not elected- y’know installed like a toilet.

Mike Lindell is putting his money where his mouth is. He now offered up a $5,000,000 Challenge for his Cyber Symposium on August 10th. He announced it today on Steve Bannon’s show, Bannons War Room. Steve Bannon: I don’t know what’s more over the top, our open or what Mike Lindell’s about to do… Mike, what are we talking about here? You’ve got this Cyber Symposium. It’s the 10th, 11th and 12th (August) in Sioux Falls South Dakota… You’ve invited all the world, all the top cyber experts. You’ve invited all the politicians. You’ve invited all the world’s media. You’re throwing down. You’re gonna present all of your data for the first time… And is the $5,000,000 kind of winner take all? Are you challenging people with a $5,000,000 offer if they can prove you wrong? If they can prove that you don’t know what you’re talking about, you’ve got nothing to show, they win $5,000,000? Walk us through this. Mike Lindell: I decided, you know what? CNN Called. They’re trying to discredit the symposium before we even get it out there or before we even show it. So what I’m doing is I put up $5,000,000, noe remember the public is not invited. I want it to be the most watched event ever. And you’re gonna watch this challenge, it’s $5,000,000. If more than one get it then it’s split. It’s one $5,000,000 prize if they can show that this is not the valid data from the 2020 election, the November election. Here’s a few reactions from the fine people of the internet… “Mike’s putting his money where his mouth is! That’s the boldest “come at me bro” I’ve seen from anyone regarding the selection of 2020″ “Biden was installed not elected- y’know installed like a toilet.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Will certainly what he has shown so far has been compelling but absolutely falls short of the standard of proof. That’s why I want to see everything he has, I want him to show his work. Plenty of people have been lying and grifting - skepticism is valid.

One of the problems is that people hype up every single person who claims to have proof. When it falls short, it ruins their own credibility and by extension the credibility of anyone else who claims to have proof.

Without the hype, we simply could’ve progressed from one batch of compelling evidence to the next to continue to build a case that the election was stolen. But people have to ruin it by overreaching and claiming they have slam dunk hard proof when that’s not at all what they have been presented with. There’s nothing wrong with the evidence being very compelling, but that’s all that it is. And that’s fine, or at least it should be, as we build towards an airtight case.

But everyone has to run around like a headless chickens claiming that they have ultimate hard-core lockdown proof and it makes us all look stupid and silly. It makes it too easy to convince people that people are lying about election fraud. I don’t understand why some people, especially around these parts, continue to make it easier for Democrats and the mainstream media to shrug off legitimate claims and legitimate evidence. We are doing the job for them.