WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

Because I'm now a mod, I've made some changes to the sidebar:

  • I removed a section called QProofs that linked to three links that do not work.
  • I removed the rule about "No posts that ask questions" because that rule seemed silly to me, and in the previous rules post that was already stated to be no longer in effect.
  • I added "Free debate is allowed and encouraged as long as it is civil" to "No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing" to go along with the rule and clarification in the previous rule post. The rule distinguishes between good faith criticism and constructive criticism against bad faith criticism, destructive criticism and ad hominem, hence why "bashing" is what the rule is against and not merely anti-Q or anti-Trump posts generally.
  • I removed " Posts about other users are not allowed. (In most cases)" because the civility rule covers call-out posts because call-outs in most cases are for unneeded drama.
  • I added "no pornography" but not the "obscene language" part because the civility rule makes that somewhat redundant.
  • I won't add "no bashing Moderators or Janitors" or "no advocacy for violence" because the former is covered by the civility rule (and the rule itself sounds as though I'm asking for extra manners towards myself) and the latter is in the TOS and thus a site-wide rule.

To be clear, the rules have changed little, and have been re-written in a different place.

Because I'm now a mod, I've made some changes to the sidebar: - I removed a section called QProofs that linked to three links that do not work. - I removed the rule about "No posts that ask questions" because that rule seemed silly to me, and in the previous rules post that was already stated to be no longer in effect. - I added "Free debate is allowed and encouraged as long as it is civil" to "No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing" to go along with the rule and clarification in the previous rule post. The rule distinguishes between good faith criticism and constructive criticism against bad faith criticism, destructive criticism and ad hominem, hence why "bashing" is what the rule is against and not merely anti-Q or anti-Trump posts generally. - I removed " Posts about other users are not allowed. (In most cases)" because the civility rule covers call-out posts because call-outs in most cases are for unneeded drama. - I added "no pornography" but not the "obscene language" part because the civility rule makes that somewhat redundant. - I won't add "no bashing Moderators or Janitors" or "no advocacy for violence" because the former is covered by the civility rule (and the rule itself sounds as though I'm asking for extra manners towards myself) and the latter is in the [TOS](https://poal.co/tos) and thus a site-wide rule. To be clear, the rules have changed little, and have been re-written in a different place.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing

Free debate is allowed

Lol.

[–] 4 pts

There's a difference between genuine criticism and bashing. I figure most are aware of civil disagreement.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

Exactly - It's important for us to consider objective information even when it's not what we want to see.

Yeah I criticize freely and also join in and encourage when I see good info posted here. Seems fair to me that if I go too far I get booted. Rules are rules and I’m a guest here.

You fucking Qtard.

[–] [deleted] 3 pts

As I've told you before, you raise some valid points, but your delivery, e.g.

You fucking Qtard

diminishes the points you're making and makes them less likely to be heard. We'd be better off focusing on common goals rather than divisive labels.

[–] 0 pt

Thank you for understanding.

[–] 1 pt

Lots of places you can go to voice your hate.

Maybe you shills and Trump/Q haters should start your own sub. I doubt you'd get many of us here to bother you while you tell each other how much you hate but never offer any supporting opinions worth discussing.

It would be too boring for us.

I neither hate Q or Trump. What I hate is all of the constant lies, and treating speculation as "truth". I deal on the plane of reality, unlike many here in these subs that look a Q and Trump as a deity and worship them with a fervored obsession.

Oh yes, if you disagree it’s “hate.” Straight from the liberal handbook. You’re better than that.

[–] 0 pt

No she is not better than that. She is a democrat operative here to make the Conservative positions look like mental retards. She is a troll.

[+] [deleted] 0 pt