Anyone abusing a child should be dealt the harshest of consequences, as should those that run cover for them, as should those that would taint another with false claims of either.
The author of this article, along with OP, falls into the last category.
An angry parent wrote a highly incendiary letter making unsubstantiated claims of child abuse. That parent included St. Johns as supporting the claims in the letter, without prior knowledge or permission from St. Johns.
St. Johns simply asked for her name to be removed from the letter.
This vexed twisting of facts to craft a damning narrative has all the telltale characteristics of a panicky leftist hit piece.
I’ll be looking into St.John to see why the left is so blatantly triggered. She must be checking the right boxes.
As the article points out, these are allegations, and also points out their are many witnesses that they can interview to determine if the allegations are legit or not.
As the article points out, these are allegations
As the article headline points out:
“Heidi St. Johns covered up sexual abuse claims”.
That is a declaration, offered without qualifier or equivocation. People making those claims without proof are deserving of harsh consequences. Not after losing a defamation suit, but immediately upon publishing without proof.
Notice the word 'claims'. Anyone can claim anything from fact to fiction.
(post is archived)