Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Attorney and legal scholar John Eastman joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning.

Steve and John Eastman discussed Arizona Senate President Karen Fann’s OAN interview over the weekend. Fann suggested that the Arizona Senate does not have the authority to replace the electors in the state of Arizona.

Eastmen told Steve Bannon: “We can point to Section 2 of Title 3 of the United States Code that says when a state has had an election and has failed to make a choice on the day that was prescribed by law, meaning the choice that was made, the assumption is it was fraudulently given because of the illegal votes, the electors can be made on a subsequent date in such manner as the legislature in some state may direct.”

But there is a lot of work to be done before this could ever happen.

Attorney and legal scholar John Eastman joined Steve Bannon on The War Room on Monday morning. Steve and John Eastman discussed Arizona Senate President Karen Fann’s OAN interview over the weekend. Fann suggested that the Arizona Senate does not have the authority to replace the electors in the state of Arizona. Eastmen told Steve Bannon: “We can point to Section 2 of Title 3 of the United States Code that says when a state has had an election and has failed to make a choice on the day that was prescribed by law, meaning the choice that was made, the assumption is it was fraudulently given because of the illegal votes, the electors can be made on a subsequent date in such manner as the legislature in some state may direct.” But there is a lot of work to be done before this could ever happen.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (17).
[–] • 0 pt

did you read 3 USC sec 2 and 5 in combination and see how they work. I did extensive research on the Electoral College prior to the election of 2020. I know the Constitutional clauses, laws and supreme Court rulings on the matter like i know the back of my hand. What better source for info do you have? If I am misinformed I await your better information source so I don't misinform anyone about what the Constitution, United States Code or supreme Court rulings have to do with this issue. Thank you in advance for your help.

[–] • 0 pt

You are confusing states rights with the constitution. Any state can pull their electors and after that we are in uncharted waters.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Au contrare. You are confused and not really bringing any substance at all. 1st States don't have "Rights" they have powers granted by their citizens, Rights belong to We the People. 2nd the process of Electing of the President is under the US Constitution and not State Constitutional power. Actually I know in Michigan its Constitution defers to the US Constitution and Laws of the United States on federal election issues. The office of President and the 12th Amendment Electors are creations of the US Constitution and therefore were ratified by States. State powers granted to State governments in State Constitutions apply only to State issues and not federal issues. The supremacy clause ratified by the States places the Constitution and Laws of the United States above State Laws. The 10th Amendment does not apply because the power to remove the sworn in President is granted to Congress and or the cabinet Officers of the 25th Amendment not the States. It is understandable to not comprehend this information if you have not studied the information, but do yourself a favor and stop pretending to know it is wrong and have no source of info to back up your claims of knowledge.