>Naturally Trump would verbally endorse his 'seven' new platforms. >he would be posting the same comment, at the same time, on each platform, ie intentional outrageous redundancy. A video of him saying that a particular account is his is the best and easiest way to guarantee that it is. He might do as you suggest and create multiples that mirror each other for the reason I stated, but only a video of him acknowledging the accounts is any guarantee. The question that arises here is: has he ever endorsed that site, and if not, why not? The original question was regarding the delay in posting his statements at donaldjtrump.com. There could be very logical (strategic) reasons for him doing that. Notice that some people are able to publish these quotes before they get posted at the site. That would indicate that they're either working with him, or are involved in working against him. I haven't being paying close enough attention to who they are up to now, but it would be a good idea to start. This would tell us who he's leaking information to, and it may be that he's testing them for honesty before he uses them for later drops, or it may be that he already trusts them and we should watch them for later drops if/when things start to get chaotic and we don't know who to trust or what to believe. Or maybe he knows he can't trust them but is feigning trust while using them to put out information that will end up leading the enemy to think or act in a certain way. Whatever the case, Trump is alert enough to know about that site and how it's operating. We should be looking at who posts the statements before they're released on the site, what those statements are, and how they might be received by the enemy. We should also keep in mind that Trump has never endorsed that site (AFAIK), so that gives him plausible deniability for anything posted there. The Barr and Milley statements from that site are two that I think are important to focus on. The Barr statement resulted in a US attorney sending Trump a letter alleging that Barr made statements to him that reflected what the statement said. The attorney claimed that Barr told him not to investigate the election fraud in his state. But what if Barr has always been working closely with Trump and Trump is leading others to think Barr screwed him? The US attorney may have just fallen into a trap, exposing himself over the election fraud. Military-grade information operations can be very complex, and a genius like Trump will use the tactics to full advantage. Perceptions are an important aspect of them, and Trump knows this. How many times has Q told us that optics are important? All we can do at this point is support Trump and the Constitution, and if we're inclined, pay careful attention to detail and study how the game is being played in order to understand what's going on.