I share your concerns about this and the resulting alienation.
It's ironic that this is supposed to be about "We the People," yet We the People are getting blocked by anyone with a voice.
I share your concerns about this and the resulting alienation.
It's ironic that this is supposed to be about "We the People," yet We the People are getting blocked by anyone with a voice.
Forget these rnc stooges.
If Trump opened up 7 or so promising speaking-platforms simultaneously.. this would accomplish three goals, (1) immediately reestablish communication with the public, (2) reduce the overload effect on any single platform, (3) all Trump accounts having the same distinct username, each linked to the others, would defeat all impostor accounts.
3) all Trump accounts having the same distinct username, each linked to the others, would defeat all impostor accounts.
This isn't correct. Anyone could do this to impersonate him. Only seeing him in a video stating that an account or site is his is going to assure that it is.
Naturally Trump would verbally endorse his 'seven' new platforms. The '7x launch' itself would be a big news story, which MSM would of course ignore.
Just to clarify, the idea is.. that he would be posting the same comment, at the same time, on each platform, ie intentional outrageous redundancy. (btw it doesn't have to be 7 sites, could be as few as 3.. and still work)
If an 8th (or 4th if opening with only three) impostor platform appeared, even with the same username, people would know it was fake.. it not being endorsed by the original seven (or three).
Naturally Trump would verbally endorse his 'seven' new platforms.
he would be posting the same comment, at the same time, on each platform, ie intentional outrageous redundancy.
A video of him saying that a particular account is his is the best and easiest way to guarantee that it is. He might do as you suggest and create multiples that mirror each other for the reason I stated, but only a video of him acknowledging the accounts is any guarantee.
The question that arises here is: has he ever endorsed that site, and if not, why not?
The original question was regarding the delay in posting his statements at donaldjtrump.com. There could be very logical (strategic) reasons for him doing that. Notice that some people are able to publish these quotes before they get posted at the site. That would indicate that they're either working with him, or are involved in working against him. I haven't being paying close enough attention to who they are up to now, but it would be a good idea to start. This would tell us who he's leaking information to, and it may be that he's testing them for honesty before he uses them for later drops, or it may be that he already trusts them and we should watch them for later drops if/when things start to get chaotic and we don't know who to trust or what to believe. Or maybe he knows he can't trust them but is feigning trust while using them to put out information that will end up leading the enemy to think or act in a certain way.
Whatever the case, Trump is alert enough to know about that site and how it's operating. We should be looking at who posts the statements before they're released on the site, what those statements are, and how they might be received by the enemy. We should also keep in mind that Trump has never endorsed that site (AFAIK), so that gives him plausible deniability for anything posted there.
The Barr and Milley statements from that site are two that I think are important to focus on. The Barr statement resulted in a US attorney sending Trump a letter alleging that Barr made statements to him that reflected what the statement said. The attorney claimed that Barr told him not to investigate the election fraud in his state. But what if Barr has always been working closely with Trump and Trump is leading others to think Barr screwed him? The US attorney may have just fallen into a trap, exposing himself over the election fraud.
Military-grade information operations can be very complex, and a genius like Trump will use the tactics to full advantage. Perceptions are an important aspect of them, and Trump knows this. How many times has Q told us that optics are important? All we can do at this point is support Trump and the Constitution, and if we're inclined, pay careful attention to detail and study how the game is being played in order to understand what's going on.
Interesting development: donaldjtrump.com deviated from their 6 (or more) week long pattern today to publish one of Trump's statements on a Wednesday, ie during their normally blacked out period. Statement is pasted below.
Too soon to tell if this is a meaningless gesture, error, or acquiescence. Hoping they heard and hated my suggestion that Trump begin (mirror) speaking simultaneously on a few predominate new and old platforms. ____
ICYMI: “Hunter Biden complained that ‘half his salary’ went on paying Joe’s bills” 07/14/21 Read the full article by Josh Boswell and Jennifer Smith with the Daily Mail here. (dailymail.co.uk)
UPDATE 3: Sometime between now and UPDATE 2 this morning donaldjtrump.com dumped another three days worth (complete?) of POTUS' Statements.
"What an echo!" - The Scarecrow
UPDATE 4: Last Trump Statement released on July 22nd. So unless The President has been silent for three days, treasonous NWO RINO stooges at the deliberately dysfunctional donaldjtrump.com site are still pigeonholing [withholding] the daily statements of The President Of The United States.
UPDATE: donaldjtrump.com has apparently broken their longtime 'week-withholding pattern' and has begun posting daily Trump statements. Now I suggest they redesign the site for functionality as opposed to decrepitude, ie bring it into the 21st century.
UPDATE 2: Treasonous RINOs at donaldjtrump.com continue blatantly censoring daily statements of The President of the United States. The unusual out-of-pattern dump on July 15th was just an obfuscating 'head fake'.. their National treachery continues.
Forget these traitors. Time for Trump to begin (mirror) speaking simultaneously on multiple platforms.
I've noticed this as well, and I'm not sure what to think of it.
It might be that Trump is doing it on purpose to make certain false statements to bait the enemy and allow himself plausible deniability (AFAIK, he has never stated that it's his site), or it might be that the site is fake.
Either way, I take it for what it is and nothing more.
They're not friendlies, they're (((controlled opposition))).
Yes Trump could actually 'reach people' on one of the new Patriot platforms, or even something like Telegram.. better yet all simultaneously. Don't think he realizes how destructive it is for his followers not to hear his daily view, countering the cabal's lies, on current issues.. ie a replacement for his voice on twitter.
Trump is starting to do a lot of interviews and rallies and such, which is what you should pay attention to. Any online accounts or websites that he hasn't ever tied himself to during one of these should be considered questionable.
Perception management is a part of information warfare and psychological operations. Understanding how it can be used on the internet will help in understanding what might be going on here.
Perception management is a term originated by the US military. The US Department of Defense (DOD) gives this definition:
Actions to convey and/or deny selected information and indicators to foreign audiences to influence their emotions, motives, and objective reasoning as well as to intelligence systems and leaders at all to influence official estimates, ultimately resulting in foreign behaviors and official actions favorable to the originator's objectives. In various ways, perception management combines truth projection, operations security, cover and deception, and psychological operations.
"Perception" is defined as the "process by which individuals select, organize, and interpret the input from their senses to give meaning and order to the world around them". Components of perception include the perceiver, target of perception, and the situation.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/perception-management-how-steers-public-nazrul-khan
Think about how Trump might apply this military tactic. Plausible deniability regarding certain statements comes to my mind. Who he's trying to influence and in what way depends on the message, and not all statements posted there are intended to influence so much as to establish trust that these are legitimate statements coming from him. There are various target audiences that he might be attempting to influence for various different reasons, some of which we won't understand because they're not intended for us. The reactions of the average viewer (i.e. you and I) are less important than certain others.
(post is archived)