Judges have a choice to take cases, non-activist judges, or judges who follow the rules, recuse themselves if there is a conflict or if they don't want the attention. The soros and obama judges leap at the chance to take them up.
The election cases no one would take up because they were too hot (and would allow evidence for election crap). I don't know of any evidence ever being shown in a courtroom so far, and that is out of thousands of cases. So normal judges wouldn't take them up because they didn't want their families harassed and houses burnt down, and activist judges didn't take them up because they would have had to allow evidence to be looked at.
Judges have a choice to take cases, non-activist judges, or judges who follow the rules, recuse themselves if there is a conflict or if they don't want the attention. The soros and obama judges leap at the chance to take them up.
The election cases no one would take up because they were too hot (and would allow evidence for election crap). I don't know of any evidence ever being shown in a courtroom so far, and that is out of thousands of cases. So normal judges wouldn't take them up because they didn't want their families harassed and houses burnt down, and activist judges didn't take them up because they would have had to allow evidence to be looked at.
Patriot, if they are not going to do their jobs correctly they need to resign.
Patriot, if they are not going to do their jobs correctly they need to resign.
(post is archived)