It’s so frustrating to watch these guys continuously repeat things that aren’t true. It’s so fucking frustrating. This thing is fucking dangerous enough without having to make up shit that isn’t true about it. It’s like they don’t understand that numbers exist and they can be checked on, that people can actually read the real study and find out what it says.
I wonder how many of these bits of misinformation are planted in the “truth” community to make them look like fucking retards. Because this is exactly what the main stream media points out, it’s exactly this, to make everyone who questions vaccines look stupid. And boy is it working because they really really look stupid.
There is an important distinction that you're missing and is being deliberately obfuscated in how they conducted and determined' the results of the study. Ie -
'This is because, of the 827 pregnancies that were completed, 700 (or 86%) of the women had received a dose of the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccination during the third trimester. Because miscarriages are regarded to occur prior to week 20, it is impossible to have one during the third trimester of pregnancy, which runs from weeks 27 to 40.
This means that only 127 women received the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during their first or second trimester, with 104 of them miscarrying.
As a result, the rate of miscarriage is 82 percent, not the 12.6 percent reported in the study’s conclusions.'
So the true results are as stated by OP.
Read the article. If the unborn baby dies during the third trimester, they list it as a stillbirth, not a miscarriage. If you exclude the third trimester deaths, and only look at the first two trimesters, then the 4 out of 5 number is correct. The New England journal is playing language games to hide the truth.
Try reading the actual study! The article is clearly misinterpreting the results.
The numbers are are ALL skewed because the study IS NOT DONE! Several thousand women participated in the study and most of them are still pregnant. The 827 number is only the portion of participants who have completed their pregnancy. This skews the data by artificially selecting data points of 1) women who were close to term at the start and 2) all of the miscarriages from a MUCH larger population. We have no idea what the actual miscarriage rate is until The remainder of the participants come to term. If you look at 'early numbers' of course the numbers will be heavily skewed to miscarriages because miscarriages finish early!
(post is archived)