Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

309

If Q is posting messages in the first person about events happening in the future…. 1. Can someone please confirm, out loud and in full public view, that Q has the ability to send information from the future? I just wanna hear it verbalized that we are pinning our hopes on a time traveling soothsayer.
2. Assuming Q is sending someone or some group predictions from the future, are they from future Q to present day Q? Is this a closed loop communication or from some unknown entity to a chosen individual or individuals? 3. How does Q send this information? How is it received in the present? 4. How does present day Q verify information is not disinformation from the future?

If Q is posting messages in the first person about events happening in the future…. 1. Can someone please confirm, out loud and in full public view, that Q has the ability to send information from the future? I just wanna hear it verbalized that we are pinning our hopes on a time traveling soothsayer. 2. Assuming Q is sending someone or some group predictions from the future, are they from future Q to present day Q? Is this a closed loop communication or from some unknown entity to a chosen individual or individuals? 3. How does Q send this information? How is it received in the present? 4. How does present day Q verify information is not disinformation from the future?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (27).
[–] • 1 pt

Who ever said Q was a time traveler.

Q is military intelligence not one person Research project looking glass.
Is it real is anyone's guess.

[–] • 1 pt

Im familiar with project looking glass. It was designed in the 70’s to peer into the future. I’ve also been following this Austin Steinbart guy who claims he is Q+ in the future sending comms back in time. He unlike the majority of the Bitchute clowns strikes me as someone who at least is coming up with his own information and not repackaging everyone else.

[–] • 2 pts

Hmmm well you should probably stop following Austin Steinbart. He is not Q+ Q Is Military Intelligence. Q+ is President Trump. I have followed Q from the start. I don't know everything but I do know Q+ is Trump himself.

[–] • 1 pt

Steinbart is a paytriot grifter. Consume his claims at your own peril.

[–] • 0 pt

He is the Shadow Broker. Snowden's helper.

[–] • 1 pt

Austin Steinbart

LOL!!!!

I'm Santa Claus and you get rocks this year.

He unlike the majority of the Bitchute clowns strikes me as someone who at least is coming up with his own information and not repackaging everyone else.

Anyone can make shit up. That's easy. But grounding yourself in facts entails a sort of 'repackaging', if you want to call it that. Facts are provable or highly predictable pieces of information that make logical sense and everyone (who is sane) can agree on. What facts do you have to base your beliefs on? Why do you just cling to someone who appeals to you because he sounds original, irrespective of any facts?

[–] • 0 pt

Yea I don't listen to all the clowns. X22, Simon Parks, Charlie Ward, patriot Streetfight, I'm sure there are others I have missed lol. Except for X22 most of these guys came in late in the game. Big red flag with that lol. Oh and Juan O Sevan 107, another big nothing person.

I stick to the prepping channels. They seem to have more valuable information. Intel included cause they are watching this stuff just like us.