Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.1K

If Q is posting messages in the first person about events happening in the future…. 1. Can someone please confirm, out loud and in full public view, that Q has the ability to send information from the future? I just wanna hear it verbalized that we are pinning our hopes on a time traveling soothsayer.
2. Assuming Q is sending someone or some group predictions from the future, are they from future Q to present day Q? Is this a closed loop communication or from some unknown entity to a chosen individual or individuals? 3. How does Q send this information? How is it received in the present? 4. How does present day Q verify information is not disinformation from the future?

If Q is posting messages in the first person about events happening in the future…. 1. Can someone please confirm, out loud and in full public view, that Q has the ability to send information from the future? I just wanna hear it verbalized that we are pinning our hopes on a time traveling soothsayer. 2. Assuming Q is sending someone or some group predictions from the future, are they from future Q to present day Q? Is this a closed loop communication or from some unknown entity to a chosen individual or individuals? 3. How does Q send this information? How is it received in the present? 4. How does present day Q verify information is not disinformation from the future?

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Why would anyone even attempt to seriously answer your question when it’s apparent you don’t really want an answer?

[–] • 2 pts

This is how these lefties actually think. They have screws lose.

[–] • 0 pt

I thought I asked some very realistic questions. For the record, Im more open to the idea of time travel than you may think.

[–] • 1 pt

Being realistic??? Not really. You're just throwing out half-baked ideas that have no logical reasoning applied to them.

To say you're open to the idea of time travel means nothing. Being able to discuss it logically and base it on factual data requires a background understanding of physics and quantum mechanics, for starters. I doubt you could even intelligently discuss any kind of science at all that might suggest it's possible.

You're one of those people who think you're as smart as anyone, but you reveal to those who are smarter than you that you're not.

[–] • 0 pt

There’s a reason the elite dubbed it Alice in Wonderland.

[–] • 1 pt

You're an idiot.

If I say that I will be at a certain place at a certain time, and I fulfill that claim, is that sending information from the future?

Stop with the batshit crazy 'logic'. That's how psychotics think.

[–] • 1 pt

Who ever said Q was a time traveler.

Q is military intelligence not one person Research project looking glass.
Is it real is anyone's guess.

[–] • 1 pt

Im familiar with project looking glass. It was designed in the 70’s to peer into the future. I’ve also been following this Austin Steinbart guy who claims he is Q+ in the future sending comms back in time. He unlike the majority of the Bitchute clowns strikes me as someone who at least is coming up with his own information and not repackaging everyone else.

[–] • 2 pts

Hmmm well you should probably stop following Austin Steinbart. He is not Q+ Q Is Military Intelligence. Q+ is President Trump. I have followed Q from the start. I don't know everything but I do know Q+ is Trump himself.

[–] • 1 pt

Steinbart is a paytriot grifter. Consume his claims at your own peril.

[–] • 0 pt

He is the Shadow Broker. Snowden's helper.

[–] • 1 pt

Austin Steinbart

LOL!!!!

I'm Santa Claus and you get rocks this year.

He unlike the majority of the Bitchute clowns strikes me as someone who at least is coming up with his own information and not repackaging everyone else.

Anyone can make shit up. That's easy. But grounding yourself in facts entails a sort of 'repackaging', if you want to call it that. Facts are provable or highly predictable pieces of information that make logical sense and everyone (who is sane) can agree on. What facts do you have to base your beliefs on? Why do you just cling to someone who appeals to you because he sounds original, irrespective of any facts?

[–] • 0 pt

Yea I don't listen to all the clowns. X22, Simon Parks, Charlie Ward, patriot Streetfight, I'm sure there are others I have missed lol. Except for X22 most of these guys came in late in the game. Big red flag with that lol. Oh and Juan O Sevan 107, another big nothing person.

I stick to the prepping channels. They seem to have more valuable information. Intel included cause they are watching this stuff just like us.

[–] • 0 pt

As someone who was one of the first people to find Q posts on the chans I do not think Q is from the future. You have to remember people like me were already all over those sites trying to figure out what was going on. What was being said in the media in no way resembled what seemed to be going on. Remember there were lots of posts on the chans, some real, some maybe fake, but anyone with the capability to watch traffic, like military intelligence, knew we'd been listening to FBI Anon all summer. People shit talk Q all of the time but the one thing I never see Q haters take on is FBI Anon. Because they can't. One, they are too stupid to even know and two, literally every single thing said by FBI Anon was proved true. Period. So, I do not believe Q is a time traveller, though it's interesting to consider. I think people in the WH figured out if they wanted to reach the people and circumvent the media they had to do it via sites like chan/voat. And it worked. But it all starts with those first few FBI Anon posts.

With that said, Looking Glass is very real but remember timelines aren't set in stone. Looking Glass proves that reality is changed by how many people believe it and reality is changed simply by one person showing up and believing something different. Reality is not what its sold as in college.

How would you send the info? You'd travel to the past to code it in. Remember the internet has been around for over a hundred years. You code it into the actual program. You code for certain dates. Future proves past. While I don't believe Q is a time traveller there is definitely an element is this weird reality that seems like it has the ability to access timelines.

[–] • 0 pt

I get where you are coming from. I use time travel simply out of a lack of understanding. To me, accessing multiple time lines is close enough. Thanks for the input

[–] • 0 pt

Think about it this way. IF this is a matrix then a matrix is a program and if that program is real then it is hackable. Where it is hacked from doesn't matter because timelines would be accessible from anywhere. Literally. Time isn't what they say it is. We know that. And quantum physics supports what I just said. If all possibilities exist simultaneously then reality is just an agreed on possibility. That possibility collapses when no longer propped up. I've seen some pretty odd things that support this claim and there is a ton of data to back it up. Moving around in time is one thing. Hacking into time a whole other thing. Is that what we're witnessing? Who knows. Its been non stop weird for years now. But I get where you're coming from and its definitely worth asking.

[–] • 0 pt

Remember the internet has been around for over a hundred years

Wait, what? I didn't realize Al Gore was that old.

Seriously though, ARPANET started in 1966. Am I missing something? Honest question.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

ARPANET rolled out in the 60's. These technologies as well as wireless were available at least as far back as the 40's. If you work in those industries the proof is already there. I suspect it goes back even further. If you dig deep into World Fair's prior to the turn of the twentieth century you'll start to see a pattern emerging. These were obviously a way to roll out technology seamlessly. Everyone is smart enough to know that tech, from the wheel to the cell phone, does not occur overnight. And yet, it does. ARPANET went wide in the 60's. It was in clandestine use before that.

[–] • 0 pt

There is no sending. Q knows. The Q team makes it happen.

[–] • 0 pt

Q DID answer that question if you read the drops you would realize this. The answer to the question was "military planning at it's finest''. Talking about time travel and Austin Steinfart makes us look like idiots which is exactly what the clowns want.

[–] • 0 pt

That doesn’t explain how he is posting in 2017 about events that happen in the future.

[–] • 0 pt

Credit to you OP. You triggered head q-tard moderator 666. This fuckin disinfo agent works for lil Justy Trudeau out in Communist Chinese controlled Vancouver.

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

Q is fake and gay, spend your time working out, reading classics and gardening.

[–] • 1 pt

working out, reading classics and gardening

Gay as fuck.

[–] • 0 pt

Honestly, pretty good advice.