Well to be fair, criticizing isn’t the same as attacking.
He didn’t even call to ban him or anything.
You’re the one that brought it up, he’s criticizing the person who is doing it, and you call him divisive for that criticism… But again, you’re the one that brought it up. You don’t think it’s fair game that you bring up the spamming Gnews and he adds commentary about the person posting it?
That seems a little selective, no?
Why are you responding when this does not concern you? He used the word "attack", so I am using his wording, not mine, to which I simply disagree with 'attacking' the poster. The tactic has already subverted the original message of "GNews is flooding this Sub". If 50 people flooded Sub with GNews postings, it would still agree with my original premise that "GNews is Flooding this Sub".
(post is archived)