Why are you responding when this does not concern you? He used the word "attack", so I am using his wording, not mine, to which I simply disagree with 'attacking' the poster. The tactic has already subverted the original message of "GNews is flooding this Sub". If 50 people flooded Sub with GNews postings, it would still agree with my original premise that "GNews is Flooding this Sub".
Why are you responding when this does not concern you? He used the word "attack", so I am using his wording, not mine, to which I simply disagree with 'attacking' the poster. The tactic has already subverted the original message of "GNews is flooding this Sub". If 50 people flooded Sub with GNews postings, it would still agree with my original premise that "GNews is Flooding this Sub".
(post is archived)