WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

This is a staggering number. Should be front page of every media on the planet. But the murderers own the media.

“Study from the New England Journal of Medicine confirms that when pregnant women are given COVID vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.” - Infowars

“It is clear this is a global extermination against humanity.” - Mike Adams

EDIT: Relived to find this (Inforwars') 82% number may be high. Haven't read the NEJM study. But obviously the toxicity of pharma's fake vax battery is very capable of producing such percentages.

This is a staggering number. Should be front page of every media on the planet. But the murderers own the media. “Study from the New England Journal of Medicine confirms that when pregnant women are given COVID vaccinations during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.” - Infowars “It is clear this is a global extermination against humanity.” - Mike Adams EDIT: Relived to find this (Inforwars') 82% number may be high. Haven't read the NEJM study. But obviously the toxicity of pharma's fake vax battery is very capable of producing such percentages.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

As far as I can tell 82% isn't accurate.

Quoting from the New England Journal: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2107070

"Among 827 registry participants who reported a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%) ... these percentages are well within the range expected"

12% sounds high, but the study says thats within the normal expected range without vaccine

[–] 1 pt (edited )

No youre wrong, if you look at table 4 in that study, it says that 700 of the 827 subjects got their first dose in the 3rd trimester (bottom fine print). So the true spontaneous abortion rate is actuall 104/127 or 82%.

Do you see the statistical fuckery that we need to expect in these studies? Right out in the fucking open but you had to be looking for it. What self respecting scientist would do that?

, it is that bad, unfortunately. They sent these normies to kill their babies. The ones who survive will be retards, wait and see.

[–] 0 pt

I think sold his account to a pharma company.

[–] 1 pt

If you were to manufacture a product and have some statistical idea or projected 'knowledge' that an amount will actually die from your product, and you announce a percentile range, for example '8% - 15% may suffer adverse reaction events', then any number in that range is in a "normal expected range". It really is just devious duplicity, obfuscation and semantics ....

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Relived to find this (Inforwars') 82% number may be high. Haven't read the NEJM study. But obviously the toxicity of pharma's fake vax battery is very capable of producing such percentages.