No, it doesn't. Approximately 4,000 women received the vaccination, of those 4,000 only 800 pregnancies have completed, and of those 800 completions only 100 were miscarriages. Until the other 3,000 pregnancies resolve there is no conclusive result here, but the preliminary results cannot be understood to mean an 82% loss unless you're retarded or dishonest.
>only 100 [of 800] were miscarriages.
Even if your argument is accurate, that leaves 12 out of every 100 babies dead. Do you find this acceptable?
It’s LOWER than the 15% miscarriage rate!!!!
Jesus fucking Christ you people!
1) About 15% of all pregnancies end in miscarriage so 12% is fine. 2) Dividing 100 by 800 as you did is utterly pointless because there are approximately 3,000 incomplete pregnancies. Those could all result in miscarriages tomorrow. They could not. The data is simply immature and it's useless to draw any conclusions from it other than "The vaccine doesn't immediately kill the mother or child".
“Sadly, miscarriage is estimated to occur in about 1 in 4 pregnancies (equal to 25 in 100) in the UK (outside of the pandemic) and most occur in the first 12 weeks (first trimester) of pregnancy, so some miscarriages would be expected to occur following vaccination purely by chance.”
so some miscarriages would be expected to occur following vaccination purely by chance.
The problem is that they don't use the same measurement when looking at COVID deaths. Instead, any death that is even remotely possible to be COVID is classified as such. Otherwise, they would have to come to the conclusion that COVID is just a somewhat bad flu that seems to have mutated into a less bad strain now.
If they are going to use one method for categorising one group, and another method for categorising another group, then they cannot be used to measure the comparative risks. Yet they are. They will use the "corrected for statistical chance of all cause death" risk profile of the vaccines against the running around screaming with your fucking hair on fire risk profile of the coof coof.
Yes retard, its completely normal. Before medicine became to the level it was today its more likely 10% of mothers died in child birth too
That is an extremely high number and what should be pushed, not the dishonest 82%. If we push bad data, it does a lot of damage towards convincing people of things that are true.
No you are wrong https://files.catbox.moe/k7ppi3.jpeg
They quote 12% of the 827 subjects had spontaneous abortion prior to 20 weeks. But at the bottom they state that 700 subject had the vax in the 3rd trimester. The true rate of spontaneous abortion among people that had the vax in the first 2 trimesters was 82%. This is astoundingly high!
The dishonesty was from the authors who included 700 subjects in the spontaneous abortion number when they weren’t capable of having a miscarriage at <20 weeks because they hadn’t taken the vax at that point!
(post is archived)