Oh, so Bill Barr is in Gitmo, waiting to be hanged. I guess they replaced him with an equally evil clone, right?
Save yourself some time. This is fiction writing from the desk of 'realrawnews'. It's designed to attract naive individuals to be used against the rest of us to possibly label us as 'dangerous'. The next step is to shut Poal down and censor us. It is not worthy of comment other than its denunciation. 1Paydaddy has posted this previously getting the same responses. If those comments were then not loud and clear, one has to wonder what the intent is for re-posting it with identical verbiage.
Have any sauce Micheal Baxter is designed to attract naive individuals to be used against the rest of us?
No one here or any elsewhere can corroborate it. Michael Baxter's 'realrawnews' has been labeled by USA Today (usatoday.com) as a 'far right news blog', in which they claim to have contacted Baxter to provide affirmation to the Pelosi story. Baxter never responded. This seems to only corroborate my own research in that the stories are fake. RealRawNews on its website claims to be an "award-winning independent publisher". Really? It's origin is very recent. On its website, it further states - "Real Raw News is owned and operated by Michael Baxter, a former mainstream journalist and former English teacher." Furthermore, it states -- "Information on this website is for informational and educational and entertainment purposes. This website contains humor, parody, and satire. We have included this disclaimer for our protection, on the advice on legal counsel."
All content on Real Raw News is written by Michael Baxter. I seem to recall reading somewhere that Michael Baxter worked at, but was fired from, the left-wing satirical publication -- 'The Onion'. This information I can no longer find and seems to have disappeared. Michael Baxter is a "former mainstream journalist and former English teacher."? In fact, there is very little on what I can find on Michael Baxter. This is a red flag. I believe the news articles are 'sold' to the naive public under the disclaimer for 'entertainment purposes'.
I give no credibility to the articles written by Michael Baxter. I'd advise you to do the same if I were you unless you can thoroughly corroborate it.
Don't shoot the messenger. At this point I think anything is possible.
(post is archived)