Classic demolition. It is astronomically impossible for a building to be pulverized and fall into its own footprint unless it was a demolition with set charges. Earthquakes and even missiles will not, one pulverize and, two drop a building in its own footprint. The blast portion may be pulverized, but the intent is to destroy the enemy in the building, not pulverize the entirety of it. In both cases of earthquake and missile strike, the building falls over and a lot of its structure remains in tact. In addition, there has never been a high rise fire that has caused the skyscraper to collapse. There has never been one case of this in the history of high rise buildings.
Yes, building 7 man, come on .....
I'm not convinced.
I think this is a demolition to capitalize on insurance payout.
BTW, who owns the building and what their insurance policy look like. I predict they purchased or upgraded their policy recently.
Good questions. These are questions that investigative reporters of the MSM once asked. Not anymore. We are the news now.
No one in the media is asking about the bright flashes as it went down. We are meant to believe it failed in the basement area but that doesn't. Explain why it crumbled all the way up as it went down. They owners had to know it would fail certification since inspection has been going on for three years with troublesome reports. Insurance upgrades or changes will be the smoking gun.
Failing the certification would nullify insurance policy.
To me this reeks of insurance fraud and mass murder.
At very least, gross negligence and reckless disregard for human life.
(post is archived)