> eyes Speaking of eyes. video starts with door open, and no hands on it. Now we can imagine what happened (read: imagination.) We do "see" security is docile and not actively trying to prevent people entering. That doesn't mean permission was granted. If you want to talk 'eyes" please upload vid where "eyes" come into play (re: physical proof) I can also speculate why the uploader of this video chose to edit out what happened immediately prior. The uploader of this is clearly obscuring something. It starts as camera pans and door opening. For context, did crowd open it? Did somebody inside kick it open? No indication that they were waved in, period. You confuse "open your eyes' with "use your imagination." Two entirely different tools.