I agree that this is more a classic demolition than anything to do with HAARP. The boom and then the collapse are all classic building demolition. This is almost identical to 911 building 7 collapse. What was the motive? Increasing structural settling issues? Was it indeed sinking? Who is the owner? Is it another Larry Silverstein? Better check to see what the insurance policy taken out on the building was. Chinese construction crews working on the building? Intended to distract for 'something' else?
Folks, you can't make this shit up. From the get-go this is so-so suspicious. There is no way a structure collapse into its own footprint without explosive devices ignited at the load bearing points on the building. All building collapses resulting from natural causes (earthquake, floods, etc.) do not collapse into its own footprint. They fall over and then the weight of the impact breaks them apart. Don't buy into the HAARP narrative. This immediately smells like a fool's bait.
What was the motive? Who is the owner? Is it another Larry Silverstein? insurance policy taken out on the building? Chinese construction crews working on the building? Intended to distract for 'something' else?
All good questions here. Let's look for answers!
One guy saying McAfee had 31tb in there.
https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMdfQYskN/
I wouldn't be surprised if that was diversion. Dick move by McAfee if true, he kept everything hidden. Something like that would be expected. But he was a dick sometimes, so to be expected.
He supposedly had a "dead man switch" He was smart enough (techwise) to set one up for sure. If it was triggered then it may have given away the location of the main data source. Which was maybe in the building. I mean, it's a plausible theory.
(post is archived)