WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

327

The Senate investigative report on the attack 6 Jan. It is over 100 pages, but basically blames any government agency for not telling them there was going to be an incident that day. Anyone, who has seen the video of Jeremy Brown, Green Beret, would know his recording not only refutes this, but the FBI agents that contacted him actually brought up January, as if Jan, would be a pivotal time.

The Senate investigative report on the attack 6 Jan. It is over 100 pages, but basically blames any government agency for not telling them there was going to be an incident that day. Anyone, who has seen the video of Jeremy Brown, Green Beret, would know his recording not only refutes this, but the FBI agents that contacted him actually brought up January, as if Jan, would be a pivotal time.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Now they need to investigate the 1400 hours of video they haven't yet received.

I don't know why it isn't said over and over that the protestors were excited for the Congressional sessions. We were not the ones who wanted to interrupt the session. We were so happy that, after each state was contested, we were going to finally be able to show evidence of election fraud during the 2-hour debate.

Who was it that didn't want the 2 hours of debate? Obviously, the democrats. Logically, they are the ones who wanted to disrupt the Congressional session that day.

What happened after the planned riot? That ended our ability to present evidence of election fraud for each contested state. Their riot gave them what they wanted. Plus, it helped them demonize Trump supporters.

Their accusations that conservatives are domestic terrorists could be easily disputed with the logic deduced by examining motives..and who benefitted...let alone all the video proof of FBI and antifa participation.

[–] 1 pt

Very well said. Unfortunate logic is not used in DC.

[–] 1 pt

I agree. Even our allies in DC never seem to say this. Thanks for the reply.