The idea never should’ve been introduced. Whether or not the vaccines are safe is IRRELEVANT. The point is that no one should be forced to take any therapy. Ever. At any time. For any reason. No one should ever be forced to take any medicine, any injection, any flu shot, any vaccine, Tylenol, no one should be forced to take cod liver oil or even WATER.
No one should be forced to take anything. That’s the fucking point. Tying your case to vaccine efficacy or safety sunk them and it was unnecessary to tie the two together. What they were doing in effect was challenging the judge in such a way that if he believes the vaccines are safe he’s going to rule against you because you tied the argument directly to the lack of safety of the vaccines. And unfortunately, the vast vast majority of the world thinks vaccines are perfectly safe even if they aren’t. It honestly looks like someone throwing a fight. What a horrible way to approach a judge what a terrible way to approach a case, what a dumb way to try your argument.
Unnecessarily stupid.
This is why liberals dominate, they are just smarter than the right. It’s proven every day that the right is filled with morons. Who the fuck approaches a case this way? And then he likened COVID-19 vaccines to Nazi concentration camps.
What makes you think, as a lawyer, that that’s a good fucking idea you fucking idiot?
It’s seriously looks like this was purposefully blown. This is either the dumbest lawyer I’ve ever seen or this was a thrown fight.
I totally agree with your premise. My response, really is to hear the rhetoric they use to justify even that tyrannical stance. They argue you need the spike protein to keep you safe on one hand and paradoxically argue you still need to wear a mask and social distance on the other.
Liberals aren't smarter. They're parrots and repeat talking points. They appear to be able to stay on message no matter what. They wear their opponents down. The smarts come from the people who brainwash the dolts parroting the talking points.
Even a lawyer can't successfully argue circular arguments. A false premise is presented, using false arguments. Choices are presented that are not acceptable. Acceptable choices are not allowed.
We are at war. Our enemy has powerful weapons. We need counter weapons. First, we need to realize we're at war.
(post is archived)