Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

It is said sinning against the [Holy] Spirit is the only unforgivable sin. Whatever exactly it is, it means it cannot be undone. The mRNA injection debases and corrupts one's immune system. The implications may be permanent. In fact, the lasting deleterious effects may be generational.

It is said sinning against the [Holy] Spirit is the only unforgivable sin. Whatever exactly it is, it means it cannot be undone. The mRNA injection debases and corrupts one's immune system. The implications may be permanent. In fact, the lasting deleterious effects may be generational.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (30).
[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

No man can take away what God has given.

[–] • 0 pt

Correct. Sinning against the Holy Spirit is an unforgivable sin. Jesus would not change this. His kingdom is built on a rock and doing so would conflict with Divine Order to which He represents. Perhaps a study of the Divine Order is worth while for one to better understand the immutable laws of Nature, which in turn is governed by the Eternal Law of our universe. Just like the Divine Order, we must be part of it or else we will cease to be. Our biology is innately intertwined with the Divine Order and any genetic adulteration to our body is dealt with by retribution. It always has been ab initio and always will be. If one understood the Decalogue, they would know the very basis of it is built on Nature's Law. The 13th century theologian, Thomas Aquinas has provided very good insight to how Nature's Laws (Adamic Law) pertains to mankind's Law (Decalogue). If getting the mRNA jab, changes your DNA and affects procreation, it is an abomination against the Holy Spirit. It cannot be undone. It is therefore an unforgivable sin.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

I only believe what the Holy Spirit reveals to me in the Holy Book of the Bible.

Extraneous philosophers, theologians and pontificators have no merit of biblical authority to me. While these individuals have some interesting things to say sometimes, I do not adhere to their word as the final say of what is in the bible. They are the Sadducees and Pharisees of the new testament.

I do not look to the Pope for interpretation, blessings or forgiveness. As much as Martin Luther did for religious reformation, he was anti-semitic.

Orange is not my favorite color as much as someone would like to make it so. We'll have to agree to disagree here. TY

[–] • 0 pt

"Extraneous philosophers, theologians and pontificators have no merit of biblical authority to me."

I'm assuming you are referring to Saint Thomas Aquinas, since it is the only theologian I've mentioned. Wow, how education has changed. If you knew who Thomas Aquinas was, you'd know his influence on Western thought is substantial. This "extraneous" theologian was considered a major theologian, who influenced the likes of many later historical figures, including the founding fathers of this nation. This "extraneous" theologian is considered one of the Catholic Church's greatest theologians and philosophers. He is venerated in not only in the Roman Catholic Church, but in the Anglican Communion and Lutheranism and the protestant faith.

"While these individuals have some interesting things to say sometimes, I do not adhere to their word as the final say of what is in the bible. They are the Sadducees and Pharisees of the new testament."

Sir, it has become quite obvious to me that you do not know what you are talking about, nor do I believe you are interested in knowing about our Creator's Nature and the Eternal Laws as part of His Divine Order. You live in it and dwell here, yet it is cosmopolitism that has over taken corporate Christianity and blinded so many.