If I remember Sunday school correctly, blasphemy against the Holy Spirit is pretty specific, not something you can be tricked into.
Does the Bible say anything about preforming a dangerous medical experiment on hundreds of millions of misled and coerced people? Because that seems like the unforgivable thing here. The sheer scale of it is certainly unforgivable in human terms.
Especially since they're rushing to inject their mystery cocktail into children before the long term damage is exposed. They know what they're doing.
"..., blasphemy against the Holy Spirit,...."
Yes, this is what I was always told. After a while the answer didn't set well with me, so I researched it more and found in the Bible [Holy] Spirit was always bracketed. I looked this up and found that the bracket meant the word 'holy' was added by the patristic translators to differentiate 'spirit' from the Spirit. The word 'Holy' means 'separated'. The ancient manuscripts of the Bible used the word 'Spirit', but it was understood to mean the 'Holy Spirit' as opposed to general word 'spirit'. Further researching this I found:
The word - 'Spirit' as in 'Holy Spirit' is defined in the bible via Strong's, Thayers, and Liddel-Scott-Jones from the Greek and translated as 'pneuma' (G4151), which is defined as -- “a movement of air; a gentle blast (a) of the wind, hence the wind itself (b) breath of nostrils or mouth.” A closely related word - 'psuche' (G5590) is defined in Strong’s Concordance as the following:
(1) breath (a) the breath of life (i) the vital force which animates the body and shows itself in breathing of animals (ii) of men (b) life, (c) that in which there is life (i) a living being, a living soul. (2) the soul (a) the seat of the feelings, desires, affections, aversions (our heart, soul etc.) (b) the (human) soul in so far as it is constituted that by the right use of the aids offered it by God it can attain its highest end and secure eternal blessedness, the soul regarded as a moral being designed for everlasting life (c) the soul as an essence which differs from the body and is not dissolved by death (distinguished from other parts of the body). The word 'psuche' (G5590) is derived from 'psucho' (G5594), which means “to breathe, blow, cool by blowing.” Note, the same concept is found with the word “spirit,” or in Greek -'pneuma' (G4151), which is “a movement of air; a gentle blast (a) of the wind, hence the wind itself (b) breath of nostrils or mouth.”
'Pneuma' is derived from the Greek root word 'pneo' meaning -- “blow,” “wind.” The same relationship is found with 'aer' (G109), which is derived from 'aemi' - to breathe unconsciously, i.e. respire; by analogy, to blow. One can get an understanding of how the word “spirit” -- (pneuma), “air” – (aer), and (psuche).
So, 'Spirit', as in Holy Spirit or [Holy] Spirit is better understood.
there is definitely incontrovertible proof there is a Divine order in all that we see, smell, hear, and touch. If you examine closely any living thing in Nature, like a flower and its disk florets, or a conch shell or horn, the pattern of toroidal spirals are everywhere. Seeing this brings comfort and reassurance to know that all life follows the same exact Divine Order provided by God. We only need to observe Nature and it's immutable Order to realize the existence of God.
“Because the thing known of God is clearly known in them, for God revealed it to them. For the unseen things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things made, both his eternal power and Divine Nature, for them to be without excuse.” - Romans 1:19-20.
The Italian theologian, Thomas Aquinas, recognized the Natural Law as -- "nothing else than the rational creature's participation in the Eternal Law."
Eternal law is defined as those laws governing the eternal universe. As Dimock phrased it, one can -- "think of eternal law as comprising all those scientific 'laws' (physical, chemical, biological, psychological, etc.) by which the universe is ordered." Indeed, the Law of Nature is subject to the Eternal Law, but this doesn’t tell us what the Law of Nature is. As Aquinas noted:
“The natural law is a participation of the eternal law … and therefore endures without change, owing to the unchangeableness and perfection of the Divine Reason, the Author of nature. But the reason of man is changeable and imperfect: wherefore his law [human law] is subject to change.”
“[E]very human law has just so much of the nature of law as is derived from the law of nature. But if in any point it deflects from the law of nature, it is no longer a law but a perversion of law".
(post is archived)