US-based new hires must be vaccinated against COVID-19

[–] • 1 pt

And they are violating numbers rights, Nuremberg code, civil rights act of 1964, religious rights, constitution,

link

[–] • 0 pt

Yep.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

How is this legal against the Nuremberg Code? Is this the same old story of private industry not being controlled by any law - the Constitution, Nuremberg Code, ethics, morals, religion, whatever?

link

[–] • 1 pt

The Covid-19 injection is classified as 'experimental'. Under Federal law:

21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, there is a clear provision for the option to accept or refuse administration of the experimental product.

This means no business, hospital or college/university/CUNY and SUNI requirements for Covid vaccination is unlawful. This means no business, including airlines can mandate vaccination for employees (new or otherwise) or require Vaccine Passports. This means no government can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness.

Government rules, guidelines, and recommendations do not exceed or meet statutory law. It is always inferior even under executive order. Only the legislature can create law. Hospitals also fall under this law. Nurses, medical doctors, and staff that have refused the Covid injection and lost their job as a result have a very valid case for lawsuits. Here is the law for Emergency Authorization Use (EAU). Remember that ALL these Covid injections are categorized as Not Approved by the FDA.

16 Am Jur 2D Section 98. “An emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of ANY OF THE PROVISIONS of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions.”

Furthermore,

16 Am Jur 2d., Sec. 97: “Then a constitution should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property.” Bary v. United States - 273 US 128 “Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor in the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”

Federal law prohibits the ”denial of participation” from this business establishment as found under 28 CFR §36.202. Hospitals, Colleges and universities are businesses.

Under 28 CFR §36.202(c) further states that unless I have been individually assessed as a “direct threat” you may not exclude me from the same and equal services as others.

Denying service is a violation of Title II, III, and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964.

Title III Sections 28 CFR §36.202(a)(b)(c and 28 CFR §36.203(a)(b)(c) state that I shall not be denied the same participation and equal access as everyone else. The law prohibits any business, including , hospitals, colleges, department stores, United Airlines, Alaska Airlines or Delta Airlines, etc. from treating anyone differently or from serving anyone separately.

21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies

(A) Required conditions: (ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

OSHA released its new guidance on April 20 under a “Frequently Asked Questions” section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance. NOTE the word 'guidance' is not law by any means, but rather a recommendation or a suggestion.

Q: If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable?

A: If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7.

Folks, a business can not require you to provide proof of vaccination or require you to wear a face mask. This is a clear violation of the law.

The Covid-19 injection is classified as 'experimental'. Under Federal law: **21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1)** - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, there is a clear provision for the **option to accept or refuse administration of the experimental product**. This means no business, hospital or college/university/CUNY and SUNI requirements for Covid vaccination is unlawful. This means no business, including airlines can mandate vaccination for employees (new or otherwise) or require Vaccine Passports. This means no government can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness. Government rules, guidelines, and recommendations do not exceed or meet statutory law. It is always inferior even under executive order. Only the legislature can create law. Hospitals also fall under this law. Nurses, medical doctors, and staff that have refused the Covid injection and lost their job as a result have a very valid case for lawsuits. Here is the law for Emergency Authorization Use (EAU). Remember that ALL these Covid injections are categorized as Not Approved by the FDA. **16 Am Jur 2D Section 98.** *“An emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of ANY OF THE PROVISIONS of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions.”* Furthermore, **16 Am Jur 2d., Sec. 97**: *“Then a constitution should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property.”* **Bary v. United States - 273 US 128** *“Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor in the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”* Federal law prohibits the ”denial of participation” from this business establishment as found under **28 CFR §36.202**. Hospitals, Colleges and universities are businesses. Under **28 CFR §36.202(c)** further states that unless I have been individually assessed as a *“direct threat”* you may not exclude me from the same and equal services as others. Denying service is a violation of Title II, III, and VII of the **U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964**. Title III Sections **28 CFR §36.202(a)(b)(c** and **28 CFR §36.203(a)(b)(c)** state that I shall not be denied the same participation and equal access as everyone else. The law prohibits any business, including , hospitals, colleges, department stores, United Airlines, Alaska Airlines or Delta Airlines, etc. from treating anyone differently or from serving anyone separately. **21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1)** - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies (A) Required conditions: (ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks. OSHA released its new guidance on April 20 under a “Frequently Asked Questions” section of its website having to do with COVID-19 safety compliance. NOTE the word 'guidance' is not law by any means, but rather a recommendation or a suggestion. Q: If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reactions to the vaccine recordable? A: If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under **29 CFR 1904.6** and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in **29 CFR 1904.7**. Folks, a business can not require you to provide proof of vaccination or require you to wear a face mask. This is a clear violation of the law.