One cannot prove a negative. The onus is on those claiming covid does exist to provide evidence.
Think of it like this: I say "you're a faggot". Then I say "prove you aren't!". Your only possible recourse is to say "fuck you nigger, prove it". I made the assertion, it's up to me to back it up. If I don't, then logically others can just say 'fuck you'. It's not up to them to prove me wrong if I can't prove I'm right.
Lol. So people can just say whatever crazy shit they want and you'll believe it simply because they will say "fuck you" if you question them?
No. What I said was if someone makes a claim and provides no evidence to support it, it isn't up to me to prove them wrong if they can't prove themselves right. For a claim to be true it must be backed up by evidence. Here, I'll demonstrate:
Your reading comprehension is shit. My evidence is that retarded shit you just typed to which I am replying
if someone makes a claim and provides no evidence to support it
Like the claim that covid is real? You wanna talk about reading compression. Your faggot ass can't even understand that I am refuting a claim because nobody can provide evidence to support it.
Except you are one single voice. The overwhelming majority of people believe otherwise. Not necessarily me though. I could provide sources for your polemic, except I wanted to see it come from you. Every academic paper draws from sources. Otherwise, its an opinion piece having no merit. Good luck convincing people. I'm not convinced.
appeal to consensus and appeal to authority are both logical fallacies. "academia" is mostly a load of shit and
i honestly dont give a fuck what anyone else thinks, and i live my life as such. People take poison shots for a cold and think faggots are great, why should i care about them at all?
There you go. That's the attitude to win friends and be successful... Indeed, Dale Carnegie is the forgotten resource for modern society.
(post is archived)