WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.5K

Almost a year ago to the day, the mainstream media was scoffing at the notion that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) could have “escaped” from a laboratory in communist China. Fast-forward to today and now it is suddenly in vogue to suggest that the origin of Chinese Germs was not a bowl of bat soup.

Headlines like, “Sen. Tom Cotton Repeats Fringe Theory of Coronavirus Origins” (The New York Times), “Trump says U.S. investigating whether coronavirus spread after China lab mishap but cites no evidence” (USA Today), and “New research explores how conservative media misinformation may have intensified the severity of the pandemic” (The Washington Post) were plastered across the media back in 2020, as you may recall. Now, however, these same media outlets are saying the exact opposite now that fake television “doctor” Anthony Fauci has suddenly and conspicuously changed his own tune about the origin of the Wuhan Flu.

Perhaps the funniest of all the headlines from last spring was one written by CNN‘s Oliver Darcy that read, “Here’s how to debunk coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories from friends and family.” In the piece, Darcy explained that the lab origin theory that had already started to circulate was “fake news” that had already been “debunked” by Fauci and the Democrats.

As it turns out, Fauci and the Democrats are now spreading that same conspiracy theory more than a year later. It is now seen as “factual” to claim that the Chinese Virus may have come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which for years has received funding from American taxpayers via Fauci.

“I don’t get how you can factcheck something that we don’t know the facts on,” tweeted Drew Holden about a similar series of headlines put out by the Post that claimed it was “unsubstantiated” and “doubtful” that the Wuhan Flu originated at a Wuhan lab as opposed to a Wuhan wet market.

Almost a year ago to the day, the mainstream media was scoffing at the notion that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) could have “escaped” from a laboratory in communist China. Fast-forward to today and now it is suddenly in vogue to suggest that the origin of Chinese Germs was not a bowl of bat soup. Headlines like, “Sen. Tom Cotton Repeats Fringe Theory of Coronavirus Origins” (The New York Times), “Trump says U.S. investigating whether coronavirus spread after China lab mishap but cites no evidence” (USA Today), and “New research explores how conservative media misinformation may have intensified the severity of the pandemic” (The Washington Post) were plastered across the media back in 2020, as you may recall. Now, however, these same media outlets are saying the exact opposite now that fake television “doctor” Anthony Fauci has suddenly and conspicuously changed his own tune about the origin of the Wuhan Flu. Perhaps the funniest of all the headlines from last spring was one written by CNN‘s Oliver Darcy that read, “Here’s how to debunk coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories from friends and family.” In the piece, Darcy explained that the lab origin theory that had already started to circulate was “fake news” that had already been “debunked” by Fauci and the Democrats. As it turns out, Fauci and the Democrats are now spreading that same conspiracy theory more than a year later. It is now seen as “factual” to claim that the Chinese Virus may have come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which for years has received funding from American taxpayers via Fauci. “I don’t get how you can factcheck something that we don’t know the facts on,” tweeted Drew Holden about a similar series of headlines put out by the Post that claimed it was “unsubstantiated” and “doubtful” that the Wuhan Flu originated at a Wuhan lab as opposed to a Wuhan wet market.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

“Major media outlets spent a year demonizing the lab-leak theory as an insane conspiracy theory."

“Fact-checkers pronounced it false. Those suggesting it were banned online on grounds of ‘disinformation.’"

They have been lying to us from the beginning.

They have silenced any alternative views.

This one big cult of deception.

Why do they now only want to consider the possibility that it was an accidental leak, or a natural occurrence of transfer from animal to human?

It was a purposeful leak.

Think of the timing.

They knew at that point that they couldn't remove Trump with the first impeachment.

Who pulls their strings?

This is going to go much deeper.

It had to be done this way.

[–] 0 pt

Agreed. Most of us saw right through this a year ago. You are correct, it had to be done this way.