1000 Lawyers and 10,000 Doctors have filed a lawsuit for violations of the Nuremberg Code

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (42).

[–] • 2 pts

PCR is a standard biological technique that has been around for almost four decades.

DNA is a lot of information. Making sense of it is fucking hard, and it's not an accident that we went to the fucking moon decades before just mapping the human genome. It was easier. (Same reason we know we actually went. We didn't have the tech required to fake it.)

PCR is a tool that amplifies a particular bit of DNA to separate the signal from the noise.

But what happens when you run the signal through an amp multiple times? You get feedback.

"Listen! The aliens are talking to us! And it sounds like their language consists of some kind of...high-pitched annoying whine..."

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction

I have a doctor friend who called this in real time for months, before the narrative shift from deaths and hospitalizations to "cases" last fall and the totally coincidental spike in "cases". The CDC changed their guidelines to reduce the number of cycles through the amplifier to a standard level...on January 20th. Presumably the 90% claim is a claim that only 10% of PCR tests were performed correctly.

The same doctor has been saying for months the "vaccine" does not confer immunity, just reduction in symptom severity. I have seen numbers of people getting the Chicom virus after the vaccine.

I can neither confirm nor disconfirm the claim about ER or ICU beds. Sounds like a very country-dependent stat.

But overall? No, the "Fuck belief. The job is to understand science," crowd has been on the money with this the entire time. A lot of these claims are unfortunately not hyperbolic at all.

And this shouldn't be that much of a stretch. If these things were things that never happened...we wouldn't need the laws that make them illegal.

Crimes against humanity are absolutely on the table, and need the full gamut of tools brought to bear: discovery of evidence, cross-examination, the works.

This article is definitely bad at showing its work, though, and most noticeably absent are links to the court documents. Have an upvoat, and if anybody finds the docs, please point me to them.

PCR is a standard biological technique that has been around for almost four decades. DNA is a lot of information. Making sense of it is fucking hard, and it's not an accident that we went to the fucking moon decades before just mapping the human genome. It was easier. (Same reason we know we actually went. We didn't have the tech required to fake it.) PCR is a tool that amplifies a particular bit of DNA to separate the signal from the noise. But what happens when you run the signal through an amp multiple times? You get feedback. "Listen! The aliens are talking to us! And it sounds like their language consists of some kind of...high-pitched annoying whine..." https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction I have a doctor friend who called this in real time for months, before the narrative shift from deaths and hospitalizations to "cases" last fall and the totally coincidental spike in "cases". The CDC changed their guidelines to reduce the number of cycles through the amplifier to a standard level...on January 20th. Presumably the 90% claim is a claim that only 10% of PCR tests were performed correctly. The same doctor has been saying for months the "vaccine" does not confer immunity, just reduction in symptom severity. I *have* seen numbers of people getting the Chicom virus after the vaccine. I can neither confirm nor disconfirm the claim about ER or ICU beds. Sounds like a very country-dependent stat. But overall? No, the "Fuck belief. The job is to *understand* science," crowd has been on the money with this the entire time. A lot of these claims are unfortunately not hyperbolic at all. And this shouldn't be that much of a stretch. If these things were things that never happened...we wouldn't need the laws that make them illegal. Crimes against humanity are absolutely on the table, and need the full gamut of tools brought to bear: discovery of evidence, cross-examination, the works. This article is definitely bad at showing its work, though, and most noticeably absent are links to the court documents. Have an upvoat, and if anybody finds the docs, please point me to them.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Annnd now on refresh I see your argument is more sophisticated. lol

Still. This is may be sloppy, but not hyperbolic.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(Same reason we know we actually went. We didn't have the tech required to fake it.)

This is an interesting argument. I honestly never really seriously questioned this but since I found out about the holocaust, everything is a little less certain.

I never thought the PCRs were accurate either, but they seem to show relative trends similar to the death data. So you figure if theres a massive uptick or downtick, something’s going on which will be confirmed 3 weeks later in the death counts. That’s if they’re not fucking with anything else. But of course they just changed the threshhold for PCRs. And who knows when people will actually be switching to the lower cycles. But its not like good data is the goal of these people.

The same doctor has been saying for months the "vaccine" does not confer immunity, just reduction in symptom severity.

Well how are you defining immunity? How do you define infection?

I had chickenpox once. As long as Im healthy, Im probably never going to get another symptomatic case of it, because if I am exposed, although there may be a very minor infection, my immune response will be rapid a will shut it down before I know I have it. Isn’t that immunity?

If I get a vaccination for covid (and I don’t die of a blood clot), something similar will happen, at least if I get the same strain. I will have an 80 or 90 percent lower risk of getting symptoms, given the same level of exposure. At least for a year or two. Isn’t that immunity?

Do you think this is what your friend meant?

I have seen numbers of people getting the Chicom virus after the vaccine.

I would expect older people to get some mild to moderate cases after the vax. But that younger vaccinated people would have assymptomatic or mildly symptomatic infections. I have also assumed that the ADE phenomenon would not occur for a few years. But maybe its already happening.

Unfortunately the sort of people that push that “crimes against humanity” stuff, don’t really do it when their relatives are the perpetrators.

You know its really not an exclusively chicom virus right? You could just as easily call it the WHO virus or the NIAID virus or the UNC Chapel Hill virus. There were multiple collaborators and they were not only chinese. I got those docs if you want them.

I am a pretty sophisticated gal, thanks for noticing!

> (Same reason we know we actually went. We didn't have the tech required to fake it.) This is an interesting argument. I honestly never really seriously questioned this but since I found out about the holocaust, everything is a little less certain. I never thought the PCRs were accurate either, but they seem to show relative trends similar to the death data. So you figure if theres a massive uptick or downtick, something’s going on which will be confirmed 3 weeks later in the death counts. That’s if they’re not fucking with anything else. But of course they just changed the threshhold for PCRs. And who knows when people will actually be switching to the lower cycles. But its not like good data is the goal of these people. >The same doctor has been saying for months the "vaccine" does not confer immunity, just reduction in symptom severity. Well how are you defining immunity? How do you define infection? I had chickenpox once. As long as Im healthy, Im probably never going to get another symptomatic case of it, because if I am exposed, although there may be a very minor infection, my immune response will be rapid a will shut it down before I know I have it. Isn’t that immunity? If I get a vaccination for covid (and I don’t die of a blood clot), something similar will happen, at least if I get the same strain. I will have an 80 or 90 percent lower risk of getting symptoms, given the same level of exposure. At least for a year or two. Isn’t that immunity? Do you think this is what your friend meant? > I have seen numbers of people getting the Chicom virus after the vaccine. I would expect older people to get some mild to moderate cases after the vax. But that younger vaccinated people would have assymptomatic or mildly symptomatic infections. I have also assumed that the ADE phenomenon would not occur for a few years. But maybe its already happening. Unfortunately the sort of people that push that “crimes against humanity” stuff, don’t really do it when their relatives are the perpetrators. You know its really not an exclusively chicom virus right? You could just as easily call it the WHO virus or the NIAID virus or the UNC Chapel Hill virus. There were multiple collaborators and they were not only chinese. I got those docs if you want them. I am a pretty sophisticated gal, thanks for noticing!

parent
link