Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

It's always about the money. I wonder what the other traitors have in their closet?

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer filed under oath on Dec. 31, 2019 that she held $1,877,466.36 in a single investment in Cerity Partners Investment Account. She did nothing to disclose the investments that Cerity held for her. Therefore, she is hiding her beneficial financial holdings behind Cerity.

Corrupt politicians, judges and bureacrats have resorted to hiding their true financial interests from the public behind mutual funds and investment accounts like Cerity. Federal judges started this trend on Mar. 14, 2001 at a Judicial Conference where they floated a “guideline” that would allow judicial employees to use a “concept” (not a rule, guideline or law) called “safe harbor” where judges could hold stock in, say AT&T, inside a, say Blackrock, mutual fund without having to disclose AT&T. Then, if AT&T came before them in a court case, they could play dumb. They then put for the “diminimus” concept that since AT&T’s stock in Blackrock was proportionally small as compared to the whole portfolio, they would not be benefiting enough to be a material amount.

It's always about the money. I wonder what the other traitors have in their closet? Gov. Gretchen Whitmer filed under oath on Dec. 31, 2019 that she held $1,877,466.36 in a single investment in Cerity Partners Investment Account. She did nothing to disclose the investments that Cerity held for her. Therefore, she is hiding her beneficial financial holdings behind Cerity. Corrupt politicians, judges and bureacrats have resorted to hiding their true financial interests from the public behind mutual funds and investment accounts like Cerity. Federal judges started this trend on Mar. 14, 2001 at a Judicial Conference where they floated a “guideline” that would allow judicial employees to use a “concept” (not a rule, guideline or law) called “safe harbor” where judges could hold stock in, say AT&T, inside a, say Blackrock, mutual fund without having to disclose AT&T. Then, if AT&T came before them in a court case, they could play dumb. They then put for the “diminimus” concept that since AT&T’s stock in Blackrock was proportionally small as compared to the whole portfolio, they would not be benefiting enough to be a material amount.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (22).
[–] • 0 pt

Maybe that CUNT did get in like Biden, but it's not like anybody in Michigan will ever know or ever try to find out because the majority of you are fence-walking pussies who say stupid shit like "we'll beat them at the ballot box".

I love my country, ALL of it...what I don't like are pussies that refuse to stand up and DEFEND it and would rather spend their time reciting bullshit platitudes and posting fucking bullshit memes instead of ACTUALLY DOING SOMETHING!