WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

861

It's always about the money. I wonder what the other traitors have in their closet?

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer filed under oath on Dec. 31, 2019 that she held $1,877,466.36 in a single investment in Cerity Partners Investment Account. She did nothing to disclose the investments that Cerity held for her. Therefore, she is hiding her beneficial financial holdings behind Cerity.

Corrupt politicians, judges and bureacrats have resorted to hiding their true financial interests from the public behind mutual funds and investment accounts like Cerity. Federal judges started this trend on Mar. 14, 2001 at a Judicial Conference where they floated a “guideline” that would allow judicial employees to use a “concept” (not a rule, guideline or law) called “safe harbor” where judges could hold stock in, say AT&T, inside a, say Blackrock, mutual fund without having to disclose AT&T. Then, if AT&T came before them in a court case, they could play dumb. They then put for the “diminimus” concept that since AT&T’s stock in Blackrock was proportionally small as compared to the whole portfolio, they would not be benefiting enough to be a material amount.

It's always about the money. I wonder what the other traitors have in their closet? Gov. Gretchen Whitmer filed under oath on Dec. 31, 2019 that she held $1,877,466.36 in a single investment in Cerity Partners Investment Account. She did nothing to disclose the investments that Cerity held for her. Therefore, she is hiding her beneficial financial holdings behind Cerity. Corrupt politicians, judges and bureacrats have resorted to hiding their true financial interests from the public behind mutual funds and investment accounts like Cerity. Federal judges started this trend on Mar. 14, 2001 at a Judicial Conference where they floated a “guideline” that would allow judicial employees to use a “concept” (not a rule, guideline or law) called “safe harbor” where judges could hold stock in, say AT&T, inside a, say Blackrock, mutual fund without having to disclose AT&T. Then, if AT&T came before them in a court case, they could play dumb. They then put for the “diminimus” concept that since AT&T’s stock in Blackrock was proportionally small as compared to the whole portfolio, they would not be benefiting enough to be a material amount.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

One heck of a list of stocks. I hear the ex President of Carlyle Group has won the Republican nomination for Virginia. I can only imagine the conflicts of interest he has.

[–] 1 pt

Oh my. Everyone is in everyone's bed and pocket. We need a third party.

[–] 0 pt

We've discovered how corrupt political parties are and you want another one?

[–] 0 pt

If the system is broken , we need to fix it. Nothing wrong with a Nationalist party.