They just circle jerk until the sheep come home.
They just circle jerk until the sheep come home.
What do you think of the initial graphic? Remember this is in 2009 which means it was probably used to put Obama in in 2008.
What do you think of the initial graphic? Remember this is in 2009 which means it was probably used to put Obama in in 2008.
I suspect the CIA is behind the rigging of the 2020 election. They've got the skills, and they've used them to overthrow leaders in other countries in the past. And we know the CIA leadership hates Trump. I think it was the CIA that compromised the voting machines, which is where most of the votes were switched and faked. The Democratic Party is just a facade for the Deep State.
I suspect the CIA is behind the rigging of the 2020 election. They've got the skills, and they've used them to overthrow leaders in other countries in the past. And we know the CIA leadership hates Trump. I think it was the CIA that compromised the voting machines, which is where most of the votes were switched and faked. The Democratic Party is just a facade for the Deep State.
I suspect the CIA is behind the rigging of the 2020 election.
Agree 100% But who controls them and who did they coerce to get the job done are questions I want answered.
I'm still wondering how a leader in the Senate can say on TV "The CIA has 6 ways to Sunday to get back at you" and it didn't become a national cry for the dissolution of the agency. Schumer actually said that to the POTUS!
>I suspect the CIA is behind the rigging of the 2020 election.
Agree 100% But who controls them and who did they coerce to get the job done are questions I want answered.
I'm still wondering how a leader in the Senate can say on TV "The CIA has 6 ways to Sunday to get back at you" and it didn't become a national cry for the dissolution of the agency. Schumer actually said that to the POTUS!
I mean those are cool pictures of graphics and papers that may or may not be real, can we please stop using the word “proof” incorrectly? This doesn’t even prove that this white paper exists. If the white paper exists then you are on to something.
I completely believe it, for the record. I don’t need this to be proven true for me to know how and why they stole the election. It’s obvious anyone who can think. But we really need to stop throwing that word around.
I mean those are cool pictures of graphics and papers that may or may not be real, can we please stop using the word “proof” incorrectly? This doesn’t even prove that this white paper exists. If the white paper exists then you are on to something.
I completely believe it, for the record. I don’t need this to be proven true for me to know how and why they stole the election. It’s obvious anyone who can think. But we really need to stop throwing that word around.
(post is archived)