I don't know man, there isn't an ounce of proof of any of it. lol
Didn't he throw Louis Nathaniel de Rothschild in prison and hold him for ransom, the largest ransom in history?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Nathaniel_de_Rothschild
>After the Anschluß of Austria to Nazi Germany in March 1938, he was arrested at the airport at Aspern[3] and taken into custody by the Nazis because he was a distinguished member of the Jewish oligarchy. He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest ransom payment in history for any individual.[4]
https://www.jta.org/1955/01/17/archive/baron-louis-de-rothschild-dead-paid-21000000-ransom-to-nazis
>When the Nazis took over Austria in the Anschluss of 1938, Baron de Rothschild, then head of the Austrian banking operations of the family, was held prisoner by the Nazi secret police. He was released only after lengthy negotiations between the family and the Nazis and upon payment of $21,000,000, believed to have been the largest ransom payment in history for any individual.
Remember that "hunting lodge" that Hitler took from them? It was only recently returned, there were news articles about it. What was it called, Black Forest?
>Nazis confiscated the land in Lower Austria from the Rothschilds during WWII, during which the family’s homes and palaces in the area were destroyed, according to the Rothschild archives.
Whats that supposed to prove? Not only did he imprison a jew but he got shit ton of money out of giving him back. Would it be more beneficial to him if he kept him locked up? Would his family not be able to carry on with their business without him? I doubt that. And he confiscated their property, that again is supposed to prove he worked for them? How?
Anyone can sit there and question something.
Hitler imprisoned the highest ranking member of the Rothschild crime family and confiscated their assets. He was humiliated and deported and fleeced for 21 million. I don't know what more you want.
Hitler didn't give everything back. Black Forest. It took them decades to get that back. There was more.
>All of the Rothschild possessions were plundered and subsequently "Aryanised". The city-palace of the family was destroyed after the war. The baron never received most of his former belongings back, since most of the paintings were taken over by the Austrian state, which did not allow the paintings to leave the country. In 1998, over 200 art works were returned to the Rothschild heirs by the Austrian Government, and were placed at Christie's in London for auction in 1999.[9]
I think we are arguing the same thing, that being - Hitler wasnt a pawn, let alone a willing one. I didnt notice you werent the guy in the first reply so I was assuming you are presenting Hitler ransoming the rothschild instead of not letting him go as a proof of Hitler being their agent or something.
(post is archived)