10:45
If you're going to develop a vaccine for SARS, people are going to use you know, pandemic SARS [to make the vaccine], but let's try and insert some of these other related [viruses] and get a better vaccine.
This is reckless. They intentionally insert other viruses into the vaccine, ones that have not spread around. What if they cause the spread of these? Hubris knows no bounds.
10:45
> If you're going to develop a vaccine for SARS, people are going to use you know, pandemic SARS [to make the vaccine], but let's try and insert some of these other related [viruses] and get a better vaccine.
This is reckless. They intentionally insert other viruses into the vaccine, ones that have not spread around. What if they cause the spread of these? Hubris knows no bounds.
'reckless' assumes this is unintentional.
they knew exactly what theyre doing.
'reckless' assumes this is unintentional.
they knew exactly what theyre doing.
Still if you can make a good rebuttal using their own framework, you have a better argument.
Still if you can make a good rebuttal *using their own framework*, you have a better argument.
(post is archived)