Touch your nose if you aren't getting the vaccine.
Good comedic connection. I like that.
tap
Touch your nose if you aren't getting the vaccine.
Good comedic connection. I like that.
tap
That would be a good response for us all to use. I like it.
The problem is that vaccinated people are transmitting the DNA-altering vaccine poison to unvaccinated people. Maybe to be part of the control group we have to be taking Ivermectin as a prophylactic. But although Ivermectin prevents us from catching covid, I have no idea if it stops the vaccine poison. Social distancing sounds better than ever now.
https://www.brighteon.com/a8a25cca-c179-4a1b-baac-fe60d301ab27
Find Ivermectin online. www.parasitesotc.org
It's not strange that insurers won't 'cover' vaccine liability. Instead, there is vaccine liability fund, funded by the manufacturers and congress to compensate anyone who claims to be harmed by a vaccine. It's set up similar to a workman's compensation scheme. If you think you were harmed, you file for compensation from the fund without the burden of proving the vaccine was unreasonably dangerous.
It's a win across the board because 1 ) manufacturers are not at risk of simple liability, and are therefore more likely to invest in what is generally a terrible business model 2) people harmed have a streamlined path to compensation, and 3) you don't have multiple high-profile cases that muddy the waters around vaccine safety,
So, it's not strange that Pfizer wouldn't be individually insured against vaccine liability.
That said, there is a lot of daylight between an MMR vaccine using attenuated viruses that has been around for 70 years and used on hundreds of millions of people, and a vaccine using a novel functionality that was developed in just a few months.
Patriot, he got them to admit they have no idea if vaccines are safe in Court. So they have lied for decades about being safe.
(post is archived)