I don’t know, I’m starting to wonder here. For a while we criticized Dominion for not pursuing anyone. If the allegations were false, why weren’t they going after people making them? Now they are.
And then every time somebody shows me something that they call “proof“ of election interference by dominion, it is not “proof.”
It’s often compelling. It’s often very interesting and raises urgent questions - but it isn’t “proof.“ And I don’t tend to trust people who lie to me or exaggerate.
So when we have people on our side lying or exaggerating, and dominion and other entities start to fight back like we said they wouldn’t, it does make me wonder.
To me the most compelling thing is that hundreds of thousands of votes showed up all at once and were overwhelmingly for Biden. That is incredibly, incredibly, incredibly dubious. Hopefully Arizona will shed some light. But if we come back from the investigation in Arizona and the claim is that there was very little evidence of election fraud, I’m going to bet that millions will believe it.
That’s why you don’t exaggerate. That’s why you don’t lie. That’s why you don’t call things “proof” when they aren’t. That damages your reputation. That’s why you go on Tucker Carlson even though he’s going to ask you tough questions, make your case. Don’t melt down and freak out over tough questions. That’s why you don’t say stupid things like release the kraken. That’s why you don’t make outlandish promises and predictions. Because even if you’re right, and they might be right, that does more harm than good.
Grandstanding and exaggerating your case are bad looks.
"And then every time somebody shows me something that they call “proof“ of election interference by dominion, it is not 'proof.'"
It's pretty obvious you haven't paid attention. You are distorting the word 'proof' to your own advantage. 'To produce a belief in its truth' is really saying one could believe anything as being true and it therefore would be a 'proof'. So, using the word 'proof' is far from producing abundant evidence of a crime.
You are exactly right. We need PROOF! Conjecture is useless.
Patriot, what we do know is, in Georgia a cat that has been dead for 12 years received a Ballot. We also are aware their were more ballots then registered voters, and from Experts we have heard, they used the same pattern where every state had the same number of 80 year olds and 20 years olds voting, some were even around 150 years old. and from Judicial Watch, in Wisconsin they were supposed to clean up their voter rolls as many people had not lived in the State for many years, and later the State Supreme Court ruled that was ok. Really.
I suspect with the audit in Maricopa County we finally hear again bout the water marks, used by DHS and each State had different Water Marks, We also remember the USPS was caught trying to take ballots into Canada. So the audit should expose the amount of Fraud. Plus we have heard of major Cyber attacks during the election in these same States. so how were Cyber attacks happening if the machines were not connected to the internet ?
(post is archived)