Ron DeSantis Extends FL Emergency Order to 'Protect' from 'Vaccine Passport

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Under 21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, there is a clear provision for the option to accept or refuse administration of the experimental product.

This means college requirements for Covid vaccination is unlawful.
This means no business, including airlines can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness.
This means no government can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness.

This is also means 'Covid passports' are unlawful for flights in the continental USA. In addition, general vaccination requirements are null and void if you declare your State's religious belief exemption. Business rules do not exceed law. Government rules, guidelines, and recommendations do not exceed statutory law. It is always inferior even under executive order. Only the legislature can create law. Hospitals also fall under this law. Nurses, medical doctors, and staff that have refused the Covid injection and lost their job as a result have a very valid case for lawsuits. Here is the law for Emergency Authorization Use (EAU). Remember that ALL these Covid injections are categorized as Not Approved by the FDA.

21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1) - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies

(A) Required conditions: (ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

16 Am Jur 2D Section 98. “An emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of ANY OF THE PROVISIONS of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions.”

Furthermore,

16 Am Jur 2d., Sec. 97: “Then a constitution should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property.” Bary v. United States - 273 US 128 “Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor in the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”

Federal law prohibits the ”denial of participation” from this business establishment as found under 28 CFR §36.202.

Under 28 CFR §36.202(c) further states that unless I have been individually assessed as a “direct threat” you may not exclude me from the same and equal services as others.

Denying service is a violation of Title II, III, and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964.

Title III Sections 28 CFR §36.202(a)(b)(c) and 28 CFR §36.203(a)(b)(c) state that I shall not be denied the same participation and equal access as everyone else. The law prohibits Alaska Airlines differently or from serving anyone separately.

Under **21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1)** - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, there is a clear provision for the option to accept or refuse administration of the experimental product. + **This means college requirements for Covid vaccination is unlawful.** + **This means no business, including airlines can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness.** + **This means no government can require Vaccine Passports due to its unlawfulness.** This is also means 'Covid passports' are unlawful for flights in the continental USA. In addition, general vaccination requirements are ***null*** and ***void*** if you declare your State's religious belief exemption. Business rules do not exceed law. Government rules, guidelines, and recommendations do **not** exceed statutory law. It is **always** inferior even under executive order. Only the legislature can create law. Hospitals also fall under this law. Nurses, medical doctors, and staff that have refused the Covid injection and lost their job as a result have a very valid case for lawsuits. Here is the law for Emergency Authorization Use (EAU). Remember that ALL these Covid injections are categorized as **Not Approved** by the FDA. **21 U.S. Code § 360bbb–3(e)(1)** - Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies (A) Required conditions: (ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed— (I) that the Secretary has authorized the emergency use of the product; (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and (III) of the **option to accept or refuse administration** of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks. **16 Am Jur 2D Section 98**. *“An emergency can not create power and no emergency justifies the violation of ANY OF THE PROVISIONS of the United States Constitution or States Constitutions.”* Furthermore, **16 Am Jur 2d., Sec. 97**: *“Then a constitution should receive a literal interpretation in favor of the Citizen, is especially true, with respect to those provisions which were designed to safeguard the liberty and security of the Citizen in regard to person and property.”* **Bary v. United States - 273 US 128** *“Any constitutional provision intended to confer a benefit should be liberally construed in favor in the clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary.”* Federal law prohibits the ”denial of participation” from this business establishment as found under **28 CFR §36.202**. Under **28 CFR §36.202(c)** further states that unless I have been individually assessed as a “direct threat” you may not exclude me from the same and equal services as others. Denying service is a violation of Title II, III, and VII of the U.S. Civil Right Act of 1964. Title III Sections **28 CFR §36.202(a)(b)(c)** and **28 CFR §36.203(a)(b)(c)** state that I shall not be denied the same participation and equal access as everyone else. The law prohibits Alaska Airlines differently or from serving anyone separately.

link