I disagree. The name "Conservative" has come to mean almost anything. It's become an almost an all-inclusive term. "Neo-Conservatives" don't really want to 'conserve' anything. But, they believe that the United States is a tool to carry out Zionist goals. They are one of Israel's 5th column in America. The ideology of the NeoCons isn't any different than the ADLs. RHINOs also consider themselves 'conservative', but really believe in anti-Christ one world globalist policy. Then, there are the Fiscal Conservatives, who masquerade as Republican, but are more like democrats, except in spending. Therefore, Conservatives are NOT necessarily anything you claim they are.
I much prefer the word - "Naturalistic" or "Naturalist" over the name Conservative because it is derived from the word 'Nature'. It is clear that 'Natural' gender expressly defines male and female. 'Natural' marriage specifically defines the joining of a man and woman in lifelong monogamy. 'Natural' parents, 'Natural' children, and a 'Natural' family intentionally describes something based on Nature and being biologically related. I believe a 'Natural' government is a government that recognizes Natural Law and its subsequent Common Law that is the basis of our God given Rights recognized in the US Constitution. The original 'Conservatives' tried to conserve a former way of life, which this present generation have no idea of what that was. Being 'Naturalistic' describes everything based on Nature and excludes the conservative pretenders like RHINOs like Liz Cheney and lesbians like Tammy Bruce.
(post is archived)