WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

549
https://twitter.com/Dino_Veletanlic/status/1385983448167428097 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/breaking-happening-arizona-election-workers-running-ultra-violet-ballot-testing-maricopa-ballots-video/ Live Feed : https://azaudit.org/ 45's Statements on the audit : https://wearethene.ws/notable/218172 Additional Pede Analysis : https://wearethene.ws/notable/218183 Audit Floor Layout : https://wearethene.ws/notable/218161

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

is nothing but "spinning your wheels", but what is your solution?

What I see as the issues are:

  1. we cant "name the problem" directly without losing the middle.

  2. we cant organize at the small scale without being framed as "ebil notsees" and shut down with the resources of the state

  3. the courts don't represent us and neither does the law in any capacity

  4. We don't have time for a march through the institutions like the left did. Not any more.

  5. the media can splinter any support we have by casting us (if we become viable) as terrorists, or other boogieman, or claim we're a giant fed honeypot like they did with proud boys, further justifying anything the state wants to do.

These are the top five issues that I see, but you're welcome to contribute your own. Institutional support, money, membership, organization, control of our own message to the public vs. the media.

A political enemy essentially requires political solutions. But we're in a conundrum because so much of what the state does cuts off 95-99% of any viable political solutions, in addition to massive censorship, spying/doxxing that destroys our funding networks (like the one guy who donated ten fucking dollars to KR and lost his job because of it), or federal agencies and local police arresting our protests so the left can intentionally mine local court records to harass our guys.

We're in a bit of a pickle as an overarching political idealogy, the gist of which is: the state and its bureaucracy (100k+ officials strong, most of whom sympathize with marxism), are rabid anti-white marxists and actively or passively support genocide against christians, gun owners, european-americans, nationalists, libertarians, and conservatives. They really do want us gone. And they're using every means they have to accomplish this goal, even if its just broadstrokes and slow-stepping at this point.

But I think realistically we all can see this. It seems obvious on its face but thats why its important to restate. Because when nothing seems to be happening, when the obvious is right in front of us, its easy to fall into the trap of "it must just be us that see this", when in fact other factors are preventing broader political/social/economic/religious counter action, etc. Some of that is misbegotten beliefs in our natural support base, beliefs put there precisely because they counter what people are seeing plain as day, causing the middle to be complacent, Some of it is opinions about manufactured leadership (most of the GOP) being 'the only hope' and 'our guy'. A lot of it is this in fact. A LOT more than even people who are aware of the issue seem to realize. We have a leadership vacuum so vast and thorough that were it a car, it would be running on fumes, barely coasting into the gas station before puttering out. Thats how close the GOP is to irrelevance. It's also probably why the establishment is going to stick trump or some other back in office if I had to hazard a guess (40%) assuming keeping the ship burning a little longer is the goal. While they're doing that they'll be manufacturing a new ship for the red rats to jump onto. And this leadership will also fail us, at a critical moment, when things have become much more dire and the state makes its final move against the right and middle. Technically we're in the states final moves, but its more like the end game, then actual last two or three plays in its strategy to destroy the nation and the west.

I think the only viable solution, short of massive engineered collapse, is to take the GOP "by storm", in a blitz against its own complacency efforts, before a new "neo-GOP" can be manufactured to replace it: co-opt their playbook, so its the GOP that has to once again stand by as the state attempts to destroy us, its own replacement and people will, in the public itself, if we fail--they'll see that no political solutions are left and the GOP was the marxist DNC all along.

[–] 1 pt

That was a lot of writing for a long one sentenced solution. Make no mistake. I am not criticizing your writing. I fully understand it and what we are facing. I'm only presenting that the 'solution' takes a lot more capital than addressing what 120 years of writers have already presented. Each generation certainly had their own trumpeters from Henry Ford to Father Couphlin to Ezra Pound to Lincoln Rockwell to William Pierce. You haven't stated anything different than what Henry Ford 90 years ago himself or Charles Lindbergh outspokenly warned about. The Protocols echo what you just wrote. Your final paragraph and 'solution' is rather ambiguous. The same adjectives and 'hoorahs' could have easily been pepped by Knute Rockne at a Notre Dame pre-game locker room rally. Albeit, there is a small tidbit in your 'solution' hinting using Alinsky tactics. Its the phrase "co-opt their playbook" that triggered my thought on this, but three words is still too little to be anything other than my fertile imagine. In all, your 'solution' is no better for understanding than - "Trust the plan" was 'Q' followers.

[–] 0 pt

That was a lot of writing for a long one sentenced solution. Make no mistake. I am not criticizing your writing. I fully understand it and what we are facing. I'm only presenting that the 'solution' takes a lot more capital than addressing what 120 years of writers have already presented. Each generation certainly had their own trumpeters from Henry Ford to Father Couphlin to Ezra Pound to Lincoln Rockwell to William Pierce. You haven't stated anything different than what Henry Ford 90 years ago himself or Charles Lindbergh outspokenly warned about. The Protocols echo what you just wrote. Your final paragraph and 'solution' is rather ambiguous. The same adjectives and 'hoorahs' could have easily been pepped by Knute Rockne at a Notre Dame pre-game locker room rally. Albeit, there is a small tidbit in your 'solution' hinting using Alinsky tactics. Its the phrase "co-opt their playbook" that triggered my thought on this, but three words is still too little to be anything other than my fertile imagine. In all, your 'solution' is no better for understanding than - "Trust the plan" was 'Q' followers.

We get it, you're smart.

[–] 0 pt

Being a cynic gets no one any where. I thought you had a solution, but it turns out its all platitudes.