Yes. we'd be in a total worldwide lock-down. Since the anti-Trumpers don't believe that Trump short-circuited the cabal's plan for a worldwide lock-down, let's look at President Vladimir Putin who did the exact same thing. In fact, he fast-tracked the 'Sputnik' vaccine a month before Trump was able to get Pfizer to release their piece-of-shit injection. You could say why Pfizer didn't release it earlier is because it had to do with politics. Anyway, let's look at how utterly effective the 'Sputnik' vaccine is for exposing the criminal governments in Europe who are accomplices in this great SCAMdemic. The article - "How Russia's Sputnik vaccine is dividing Europe" (msn.com) provides scintillating insight to what Trump did here in America. You can see the EU government doesn't want the Sputnik vaccine because it destroys their timeline for lock-downs. It destroys their entire Covid narrative that's suppose to give reason to start the Great financial Reset. It's obvious to me that Putin shared INTEL with the Trump administration because their plans are nearly identical and synced at the same time. It's irregular warfare we are fighting.
Remember, without Operation Warp Speed there would be no EAU vaccine. With no EAU vaccine, we'd all be living in endless masked lock-downs. This was suppose to last until 2022. Their Pandemic Wall-to-Wall coverage and "flooding the zone" with constant Covid propaganda would have only deepen the crisis, in which ever expanding lock-downs would occur. Under complete lock-down, the economy would have been destroyed unlike any time in history. There would be exponentially more deaths than what the EAU 'vaccines' will cause. without the EAU vaccine, there would be no choice, until the Great financial Reset was fully implemented, and then our only choice to get out of this worldwide Orwellian medical tyranny would be to 'get injected, micro-chipped, and tagged' like a herd animal. If you somehow survive, you are an owned and patented product. You are no longer creation of God, but a creation of 'science'.
(post is archived)