Many municipalities have ordinances limiting or banning targeted protests in residential areas, particularly those that target individual homes. Many court cases were targeted against anti-abortion protestors seeking to protest in front of the homes of doctors who perform abortions. In State v. Castellano (1993), the Minnesota Court of Appeals relied on Frisby v. Schultz (1988) to uphold a similar ban on targeted residential picketing.
-- It is a crime to intentionally obstruct, interfere with or make passage dangerous on any public right-of-way.
-- If you endanger others while protesting, you can be arrested. A protest that blocks vehicular or pedestrian traffic is illegal without a permit.
-- You do not have the right to block building entrances or physically harass people or engage in speech activity on private property, including outdoor malls, without consent of the owner.
-- You can be charged with disorderly conduct for disturbing an assembly, speech or conduct that is likely to provoke a violent reaction, or inciting an immediate breach of the peace.
-- Illegal trespassing includes interfering with signs that mark a legal boundary, entering private property without a claim of right, or refusing to leave when the owner demands it.
So, Why is the BLM getting a pass? The police are violating the law. This man had a right to reach his home without harassment.
Patriot, appears because they are protected by the Democrats. And some democrat cities the Police are as corrupt as the Politicians. thankfully there are many Depts that will not bow to the Democrats.
(post is archived)