Often some warning/report given to someone at some level of law enforcement. Local and/or including the FBI. Yes, FBI appears to be a common denominator. So does the ignorance of relevant info also by one of the highest if not the highest law enforcement agency in the land for domestic matters. Please advise if this is not correct.
More often then not, if i recall correctly, the "alleged" are under psychiatric care, including medications.
Parental issues. And /or absence of parent/s.
News coverage by pseudo news media will also sift what is reported, depending upon certain other factors. (Easy decode.) The information will be trimmed and tailored (or fluffed up) to match the current PC narrative. Anything else will have very short span of being "news worthy".
is the fbi creating them or checking to see if theyre fully programmed and ready for an assignment?
I would put nothing past them. Anything is plausible at this point.
Often when options are presented i say to myself: all of the above, not either or.
All of it, anon.
Yes.
Good ole mk ultra
4) Online activity. The shooters always have an online presence that reveals extremist ideologies and/or support for certain groups/parties that are unfavorable to the Deep State.
The FBI use social media platforms to scout out and recruit their patsies. This is probably why they always confiscate the shooter's computers and phones immediately after the event. Their communications would reveal that they were coerced by certain others.
ThanQ, anon.
Well said. Solid point.
Of course it is a given how those who participate on even this platform are perceived. To the [DS] i say pfffft!
(post is archived)