Brother, they can never be trusted. They lied to push their NWO Agenda.
Brother, they can never be trusted. They lied to push their NWO Agenda.
This is where the rubber hits the road, too. The positive-case number can be deceptive because it’s influenced by the amount of testing done (test more people, you get more positives) and the tests’ accuracy (there are false positives). What really matter are the hospitalization rate and, in particular, the mortality number.
In fact, having more infections with lower hospitalization and mortality can be beneficial because it can help establish herd immunity.
But what of masks, which have taken on talisman status? Is there really data showing that, when prescribed for the wider population, they reduce China-virus contagion?
It doesn’t seem so. For example, writing Saturday that science shows the “mask zealots were very, very wrong,” American Thinker’s Trevor Thomas first cites the case of Florida. “Note that the cases per 100K in school systems where masks are optional are significantly lower than those systems where masks are mandated,” he writes, providing a graph illustrating his point.
Yet there’s still more. As Town Hall columnist Scott Morefield tweeted recently:
Thomas then sums up, writing that this “is all on top of all of the other science that reveals the truth on the Wuhan virus and masks: the Danish Mask Study; the mask data from ‘all U.S. jurisdictions;’ the mask data from Europe; the data out of Florida; data from the complete NFL season; the data from the Super Bowl; the data from school districts in Texas and Florida that began school last August, have remained open, didn’t cancel events, and never mandated masks; and so on.”
“Lastly, recall that Walmart, Kroger, and the like didn’t mandate masks until July,” he continues. We went months in and out of these stores where no masks were required, the virus was supposedly raging, and yet hospitals sat nearly empty.”
So it appears that masks aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. What’s more, an ex-healthcare professional theorized last year that masks may actually be contributing to the virus’s spread. How?
By becoming like Petri dishes on people’s faces. Heck, maybe this is why some top Democrats don’t seem to want to wear them (except for photo ops).
This is where the rubber hits the road, too. The positive-case number can be deceptive because it’s influenced by the amount of testing done (test more people, you get more positives) and the tests’ accuracy (there are false positives). What really matter are the hospitalization rate and, in particular, the mortality number.
In fact, having more infections with lower hospitalization and mortality can be beneficial because it can help establish herd immunity.
But what of masks, which have taken on talisman status? Is there really data showing that, when prescribed for the wider population, they reduce China-virus contagion?
It doesn’t seem so. For example, writing Saturday that science shows the “mask zealots were very, very wrong,” American Thinker’s Trevor Thomas first cites the case of Florida. “Note that the cases per 100K in school systems where masks are optional are significantly lower than those systems where masks are mandated,” he writes, providing a graph illustrating his point.
Yet there’s still more. As Town Hall columnist Scott Morefield tweeted recently:
Thomas then sums up, writing that this “is all on top of all of the other science that reveals the truth on the Wuhan virus and masks: the Danish Mask Study; the mask data from ‘all U.S. jurisdictions;’ the mask data from Europe; the data out of Florida; data from the complete NFL season; the data from the Super Bowl; the data from school districts in Texas and Florida that began school last August, have remained open, didn’t cancel events, and never mandated masks; and so on.”
“Lastly, recall that Walmart, Kroger, and the like didn’t mandate masks until July,” he continues. We went months in and out of these stores where no masks were required, the virus was supposedly raging, and yet hospitals sat nearly empty.”
So it appears that masks aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. What’s more, an ex-healthcare professional theorized last year that masks may actually be contributing to the virus’s spread. How?
By becoming like Petri dishes on people’s faces. Heck, maybe this is why some top Democrats don’t seem to want to wear them (except for photo ops).
(post is archived)