Why are you not willing to just cut to the chase and say what you think is going on when asked. All of your conversations are just varying degrees of swarmy 'Where did i say that - you misunderstand what i wrote' bla bla bla. But you never just actually clarify a straight question. Its seems like your continually obfuscating ... My overall question is simple - either one can believe there is a group working in the military and intelligence that will defend the republic from all traitors both foreign and domestic as the q-drops allude too, or theres not.Simple really. Do you think there are ??
And of course im gonna mention 'white hats and military' bc the whole topic is about 'warfare' and the 'deep state' -so you really wanna point out that im in error to bring up those two groups in relation to the overall topic ?? Jfc ...
EDIT: Oh you say 'No where did I state there are "No White hats" or "Military" in my posts. ' and call me out for adding that but in earlier posts in the past when i question whether there are white hats or not you also say 'i didnt mention there were white hats or military in my posts' as well , your just keep talking semantics and my queries aren't about date fags - thats all you, im asking what you believe and who it involves ?/ ....
It's useless to respond to you. I've answered your question at least 2 times. It's there in plain English. When one injects new issues (ergo, white hat, military) into the polemic, they've lost the context and are hoping to move it to new grounds. It's a desperate defense mechanism. Your wrong about warfare being just 'military' or 'white hats'. What is a 'White Hat' anyway? Why don't explain that to me, while I hold back laughter. It's another term without a real definition. If we talk about 'white hats', why not talk about the 'War on terror'. You can declare war on 'terror' while I declare war on 'laughter' and 'hate' and 'antipathy'.
So long, my communique has ended. 'Trust the plan' and while your at it-- 'Win one for the Gipper'.
See there we are, still skirting around the issue and now doesn't want to continue when pressed, You're so insecure of being wrong that you will type paragraphs out about 'warfare and psi-ops' and 'encrypted communications not being for the public' but is unwilling to openly say out loud what groups or people are involved when asked, so i can get an understanding on who you are talking about. Weird flex man.
edit: LMAO, wont actually say out loud who or what groups q refers too but wastes time asking what a 'white hat' is ....as if he doesnt know....
(post is archived)