No quite. I'm saying these 'Rapture DateFags' and 'Profiteers' may have been Deep State plants used to build a narrative to discredit 'Q'. It sure worked out that way. Who knows.
In addition, to the Deep State using these 'Rapture DateFags' and 'Profiteers' to discredit 'Q', there are the 'useful idiot' faction that don't recognize this and 'pile-on' as an echo chamber to smear everyone who follows 'Q'. They are the ones who consistently use the word 'hopium' to smear and mis-characterize all of the 'Q' followers. The 'Rapture DateFags' and 'Profiteers' are undoubtledly disinformation stooges whether they are in it for their own profits or whether they are part of a PsyOp DisInfo campaign to discredit 'Q' posts.
So you are suggesting that there are NO white hats or Military cooming to the rescue of the republic nor are political traitors being arrested then executed in gitmo ??
Obviously, you either didn't read what I posted or you have a problem comprehending plain English. No where did I state this. I suggest rereading it to answer your own questions.
Instead of playing words semantics , what are you saying ??. Either there is a coterie of white hat / military operators that have been documenting the crimes and will arrest traitors to the republic, as the q-comms have repeatedly stated or there isnt??.
Or are you also gonna say 'We just don't even know that' to that as well.
" what are you saying ??"
You still don't understand. Read my posts again. The following is something you missed earlier --- "Warfare is not fought in terms of time. It's based on constant reassessment of objectives." Hence, DateFagging is not on the list of objectives, is it? This ought to be a big clue to you. What war is ever fought with naming the date of an attack or advancing an objective? You won't find this lunacy in warfare. So, what makes anyone think the DateFags worked with 'Q'? It makes no sense at all. So, Cui bono? The Deep State is most definitely the party that benefits from the DateFaggots as I already mentioned.
Irregular warfare consists of PsyOP exploitation in the field of communication. If you didn't pick this up with the 'Q' posts, then you missed it there too. The encryptic communications (i.e. COMMS) were not posted on 8kun for 8kun readers. 8kun just happened to be the battle field (venue) that the PsyOp was being waged. Ask yourself why was 8kun chosen? The only element of those 'Q' posts meant for the 8kun readers and all its derivative readers, were the Patriotic Themes and Biblical verses. Each one of those 'Q' posts included encryption. Obviously, when something is encrypted, it is not meant for any else, but only the receiver that has the key for unlocking the code.
"Either there is a coterie of white hat / military operators that have been documenting the crimes and will arrest traitors to the republic, as the q-comms have repeatedly stated or there isnt??"
No where did I state there are "No White hats" or "Military" in my posts. You added this to the topic. Like I said before, only the Patriotic Themes and Biblical verses were meant for us lurkers. Everything else was PsyOP warfare. Consider this example: In warfare, if one want their adversary to react and make a move to learn more about their network, wouldn't you feed the enemy information causing them to overreact? And possibly make a mistake? The Intel from this would certainly help define the size and scope of the enemy. This is one example that was certainly going on with some of the 'Q' posts. Just posting information on Hillary Clinton that perhaps only her inner circle knew about would cause alarm, reaction, and perhaps miscalculation that could provide useful information on the scope of the network. The Deep State was certainly reading all the 'Q' posts and actively trying to figure them out. Was the 'Q' post true? Well, that is not nearly as important as the reaction the message caused. So, in this PsyOp example the 8kun lurkers are not the intended target, but merely the chaff or noise used as a distraction on the battlefield.
Why are you not willing to just cut to the chase and say what you think is going on when asked. All of your conversations are just varying degrees of swarmy 'Where did i say that - you misunderstand what i wrote' bla bla bla. But you never just actually clarify a straight question. Its seems like your continually obfuscating ... My overall question is simple - either one can believe there is a group working in the military and intelligence that will defend the republic from all traitors both foreign and domestic as the q-drops allude too, or theres not.Simple really. Do you think there are ??
And of course im gonna mention 'white hats and military' bc the whole topic is about 'warfare' and the 'deep state' -so you really wanna point out that im in error to bring up those two groups in relation to the overall topic ?? Jfc ...
EDIT: Oh you say 'No where did I state there are "No White hats" or "Military" in my posts. ' and call me out for adding that but in earlier posts in the past when i question whether there are white hats or not you also say 'i didnt mention there were white hats or military in my posts' as well , your just keep talking semantics and my queries aren't about date fags - thats all you, im asking what you believe and who it involves ?/ ....
(post is archived)