WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

295

Just watched the Mike Lindell video "Absolute Proof". He states 100%, absolute proof? He is not blowing smoke up America ass with this.

I'm not inclined to watch videos of any length much less one that is almost 2 fucking hours but I had to see for myself because of some asshat anon on here blew it all off as conjecture, speculation, barely credible experts etc.............Every expert that appeared is 100% credible. 100%. Needless to say, that anon is a fucking MORAN.

HighPlainsDrifter1.....................BO, no one likes this vari-name shit. Restore the screen names please.

Just watched the Mike Lindell video "Absolute Proof". He states 100%, absolute proof? He is not blowing smoke up America ass with this. I'm not inclined to watch videos of any length much less one that is almost 2 fucking hours but I had to see for myself because of some asshat anon on here blew it all off as conjecture, speculation, barely credible experts etc.............Every expert that appeared is 100% credible. 100%. Needless to say, that anon is a fucking MORAN. [AbsoluteProof](https://lindelltv.com/) HighPlainsDrifter1.....................BO, no one likes this vari-name shit. Restore the screen names please.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Scientific proof one more geared toward chart autists. I liked it better

[–] [deleted] 2 pts (edited )

POdPatriot here - completely agree with you - and I know this election network better than any of the "election experts" plastered on MSM and alt-media.

If you watch nothing else, spend ten minutes starting at the six-minute mark.

The biggest takeaway is this: They used an algorithm based on demographic census data for each state. The nail in the coffin is that the resulting graph, adding in fake votes for particular demographics, consistently follows the graph line of real registered voters - in some cases it not only follows the graph line but is actually above the registered voter line - obvious proof that the votes are fraudulent.

I 100% believe that Trump knew what they were doing and how they were doing it - and let it all play out to nab the bad guys.

I can help Lindell and Franks with non-technical correlating information but it's impossible to get in touch with either of them. If people believe that citizens should be heard, they need to be open to hearing from citizens.

[–] 1 pt

Get someone besides us to listen 🧱

[–] 0 pt

The real proof is in the hands of the military. This is just to wake the public up.

[–] 0 pt

Unless someone in the military chain of command is going to start actually doing something, a thousand lone wolves won't change a thing

[–] 0 pt

I watched the 1hr Scientific Proof interview with Douglas Frank.

https://lindelltv.com/mike-lindell-tv-releases-irrefutable-election-theft-proof/

The evidence he presents, if it holds up to scrutiny, is very compelling. Just wish they were a bit more mature in their presentation rather than giggling and acting like school children.

So share this absolute proof because I'm not watching pillow guys 2 hour shit.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

It isn’t “proof”. It is extremely compelling evidence. Nothing terribly new. NOT PROOF. But in saying that I don’t mean to say it isn’t very interesting- it is.

Maybe I just have a higher standard of “proof” than others I guess.

I mean it’s barely gaining traction here or on other pro Trump forums so you do the math.

It does need to be seen, however.